Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Keri Hilson discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 18:08, 26 March 2012 [1].

Keri Hilson discography edit

Featured list candidates/Keri Hilson discography/archive1

Nominator(s): Oz ^talk 12:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I have been working hard on improving the article for quite some time now, basing it on FL listed discographies such as Katy Perry discography. I believe it now meets the FL criteria. Oz ^talk 12:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 20:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

Alt text would be nice for the lead image. Done
Note at the bottom of Other charted songs: "denotes releases that did not chart or was not released." This should be fixed in the style of the other similar notes, particularly since "releases" and "was" are a bad grammar match. Done
In the music video tables, the directors are sorting by first name when they should be sorting by last name.
- Not sure how to do this? Oz ^talk 03:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - You'll need to use sort templates for the names. Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play is a good example from the current batch of FLCs. Follow the formatting in that list and it should help you fix this issue. Giants2008 (Talk) 12:20, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Done[reply]
Also, when I click on the director column's sorting, the director's names disappear in cases where more than one column is covered by one director. Without good knowledge of what's causing this, I'd recommend having one director name per song, and repeating them when needed. Done
In the refs, remove all caps from the titles of refs 14 (4x), 46, and 48. Done
Minor point, but the em dash after the first external link isn't in a good MoS format. Try making it a spaced en dash, or make the existing dash unspaced. Done

Giants2008 (Talk) 02:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

" team The Clutch.[1] As a member of The Clutch" repetitive. Done
"artists such as " would prefer "artists including". Done
"in 2004... In 2006... In 2007"... would prefer some more elegant prose, e.g. the odd "The following year" or similar (as long as its clear...) Done
Slightly confused, why would you have rowspan years in the Album appearances table and make it not sortable while then going on to make the Music videos table sortable (and hence without rowspans)?
- Problem fixed. Oz ^talk 11:11, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you insist on keeping the table sortable, link every linkable item every time.
"Taj" is a dab link.
- Removed (theres no article for the director). Oz ^talk 11:11, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Check refs for spaced hyphens which should be spaced en-dashes (e.g. refs 8 & 9) Done
You link Rap-Up every time in the refs, but not Billboard (for example). Be consistent. Done

The Rambling Man (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support just one thing I noticed, the MTV refs use the work parameter yet they are not italisced. I noticed you added two apostrophes to the cite template, you don't need to, as it puts the italics in automatically. I've fixed ref 49 as well, should have been cite news, as it the ref was from MTV news, other MTV refs are fine as cite web. NapHit (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Done[reply]
Image review: The image used appears to be free and properly tagged. Good raise 23:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Is that a good or bad thing? Oz ^talk 01:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's a good thing. I only note it to spare other reviewers the trouble of checking again and to keep track of where I've checked. You need not do anything about it. In case you wonder what this is about, read WP:IUP, which is part of WP:WIAFL. Good raise 14:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support seems in line with other featured discographies. One point- the opening sentence "...two studio albums, twelve singles as a solo artist, as well as seventeen as a featured artist, and twenty-nine music videos." should not have the "as well as", or else should not have the comma before it. You should also consider archiving your references via webcite or web archive (and the |archiveurl= and |archivedate= paremeters in the references) - while not an FLC criteria, if the websites you are linking to every go away or change drastically, you'll be left with a bunch of uncited information. --Pres N 19:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Oz ^talk 20:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support—Seems solid to me. Unfamiliar with bundled refs but I see no problem with them as they keep the list itself neater. List overall is of a good quality, so I'm happy to support. GRAPPLE X 00:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.