Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Pop Instrumental Album/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:29, 28 October 2010 [1].

Grammy Award for Best Pop Instrumental Album edit

Grammy Award for Best Pop Instrumental Album (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Another Believer (Talk) 15:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets FL criteria and is consistent with the nine other Grammy-related lists that I've successfully nominated. Grammy Award for Best Bluegrass Album is currently undergoing FLC review, but it has received support from three reviewers already so I assume it is acceptable to nominate a second list. Thank you for taking the time to review this list and offer suggestions! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 23:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "Award recipients often include the producers, engineers... " vs "to recording artists for..." vs the notes. It's not clear to me which of these were presented to the artist and the engineer, for instance?
Hmm. I am confused about what you mean here. With all of these Grammy lists, I am only displaying the artists that perform the works since that is what most people are interested in. There are exceptions, though, such as if award is related to people other than the performing artists (Grammy Award for Best Short Form Music Video, for example). For many award categories, producers and engineers are also given a Grammy. I do not include these names, unless it is for a compilation album and only the producer was awarded. This is the case for Grammy Award for Best Pop Instrumental Album, which is consistent with the other Grammy Award-related lists I have worked on. Please let me know if this does not make sense or if this does not address your concern. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well the only non-artist mentioned is a producer, no sign of engineers etc...! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean now. Actually, it appears most of the entries for Best Pop Instrumental Album include engineers as award recipients. However, names of award-winning engineers and mixers are not included in these Grammy lists. In this instance (47th ceremony), James R. Jensen was the only award recipient as the producer of the compilation album. If other people had been awarded, they would have been listed as well. Does that make sense? --Another Believer (Talk) 17:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, maybe I'm being uber-picky but these guys aren't cited (or noted) anywhere. Official recipients I guess are listed here, and I guess there's a sub-note missing which might say "all the great engineers etc who worked on these great works got credit, but not citation from the Grammys"? The Rambling Man (talk) 17:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The General source is always listed. If instructions are followed, users can view every award recipient for each year. This is consistent with all of the Grammy Awards lists. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wouldn't it make sense for Grammy Award winning albums to have articles? I.e., red link those which don't have articles?
Done. And FYI, I am starting stubs for many of the albums listed on these Grammy lists that I am working on. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • You got the wrong N.E.W.S. I think.
Ah. Done. (One additional period more than required.) Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 15:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment in response to a wave of opposition by one reviewer regarding FLC promotion, mostly relating to MoS and Access: Please let me know if any changes need to be made to the table format. If changes are required, I hope FLC nominators are given enough time to make them. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 22:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - all looks good -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Whatever pickiness there was to be had, TRM beat me to it. Courcelles 16:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Grammy_Award_for_Best_Pop_Instrumental_Album/archive1&oldid=1038039787"