Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Croatia national football team results (2010–19)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Croatia national football team results (2010–19) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Governor Sheng (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I consider that the list could be interesting to many readers of Wikipedia as it shows historical results of the Croatia national football team, a vice-champion of the FIFA World Coup. It contains many details about football matches played by the Croatia national team between 2010 and 2019, including: scorers, referees, yellow/red cards, stadiums etc. Moreover, unlike other similar pages, this one has a special style, which, in my opinion, is the most simple, navigable and best looking of all others. To be understood no unfiorm code was broken by introducing this style of listing the results, since similar pages use different styles. Governor Sheng (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Does not meet FL criteria points 1 and 2 regarding prose and lead. Governor Sheng, please refer to other features lists including ones for the Faroe Islands and Montserrat for what we are looking for.
- Note for FLC directors Giants2008, PresN and The Rambling Man, this nomination along with Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Croatia national football team results (2000–09)/archive1 and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Croatia national football team results (1991–99)/archive1 were created back in November 2018 and was not added to WP:FLC until I added it today. Also, this breaches the FLC instructions which states that
Users should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed.
– Ianblair23 (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - right now, this falls far short of the standards required of a featured list. There needs to be a significant expansion of the lead to adequately cover the timespan the list covers, detailing tournaments, notable incidents etc to start. Kosack (talk) 10:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - no sources. 'Nuff said -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.