Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Bong Joon-ho filmography/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Bong Joon-ho filmography edit

Bong Joon-ho filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL-criteria. The article has been edited to contain the same qualities as other Fls, including the recently promoted M. Night Shyamalan filmography, which I co-nominated. Pinging @BRVAFL as a major contributor. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TRM edit

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
*What are "narrative films"?
 Done Added link. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is there a link for "short film"?
 Done Added link. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why are three short films "in quotes" and the others in italics?
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Four para lead is too long. Probably two is all that's needed.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "massive acclaim from critics" no need for "massive".
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The film, which received..." too many run-ons in this sentence.
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref columns don't need to be sortable.
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tables ideally should have captions, even if they're screen-reader only.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Television table has one item so it needn't be sortable.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where are the other rotten tomatoes ratings, e.g. Sea Fog?
 Done Added. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where are the "Frequent collaborators" referenced?
 Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Check ref titles for spaced hyphens, should be spaced en-dashes.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Avoid SHOUTING in ref titles.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's my first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Your comments have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Image review – Pass edit

Comments
  • "Motel Cactus, where he also served as an assistant director" => "Motel Cactus, for which he also served as an assistant director"
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "encouraged to write a play, which resulted in the creation and release of Parasite in 2019" => "encouraged to write a play, which resulted in the creation and release of the film Parasite in 2019" (to make it 100% clear that Parasite is not in fact a play)
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely no idea if the Korean title column sorts correctly, so I will AGF that it does.....
  • Music video table should probably have the Korean title in its column to match the films table
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Performance credits table could be sortable
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: Your comments have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
  • The headers of tables need to have colscopes, e.g. `! rowspan=2 | Year` should be `! scope=col rowspan=2 | Year`. This along with rowscopes helps screen reader software accurately read out the cells of the table. You have it on a couple of them, but it needs to be on all, including the English/Original headers. --PresN 14:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PresN  Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – Pass edit

Version reviewed — 1

Formatting
  • Ref#16 – the name "A.O. Scott" needs to be formatted as last name and first name.
  • Ref#29 – "New Brunswick, New Jersey" is the only location added for any reference, so you might wan to remove it for consistency. And format the ISBN number "9781978818903" using this tool.
  • Ref#33 and Ref#34 – add archive links and archive date just for consistency, since all other citations have.
Reliability
  • Seems fine.
Verifiability
  • Did a few spot-checks (Ref#13, 17, 26). Everything looks good. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kavyansh.Singh All  Done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina – Thanks! Everything looks good. Pass for source review. Would appreciate your comments at this FLC. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I support this nomination for promotion but have one comment: who began his career in the late 1990s, creating the 1994 [...] — is 1994 considered late in the 90s, especially considering it's part of the first half...? Pamzeis (talk) 12:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The nomination will be passed when a coordinator is able to take a look at it an evaluate it; for the record, it does not have 5 supporting votes, it has 2- ChrisTheDude and Pamzeis. The others were an image review, a source review, and comments without a concluding comment. --PresN 17:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • Overall a great list. I have one minor comment: shouldn't the rowheaders be plain? Ippantekina (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ippantekina:  Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Though the issue remains with the "Critical reception" section, that is not enough to keep me from supporting this list for FL. Please do resolve the issue later on. Ippantekina (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --PresN 18:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Bong_Joon-ho_filmography/archive1&oldid=1051515196"