Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Bea Alonzo filmography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was withdrawn by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Bea Alonzo filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
With my earlier nomination receiving substantial support and no outstanding issues, here's a filmography of another Filipino actress. Bea Alonzo's career started two decades ago at 15 years old. She has achieved considerable success in film and television, particularly for a string releases with perennial collaborator John Lloyd Cruz, starring in almost a dozen films and television series combined.
Created in April, this list article has been expanded to include an interesting and readable introduction of the subject's work. I’ve tried my best to thoroughly search for RS (publications, newspapers, etc.) that are available online, since sourcing can be a challenge, especially for Filipino subject(s). Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The parent article has only 2155 characters (355 words), 17K in size. This list has 2533 characters (434 words). Any reason why this couldn't be folded back to the parent article and the career section expanded from the text in this list per WP:SPLIT? Cowlibob (talk) 18:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Cowlibob, I've considered that as well prior to creating a separate list, but have done a similar approach previously with the Angel Locsin filmography, where I've created a list in March and took to FL, before expanding the main article in May which had almost similar content to that of Alonzo's parent article before being reworked. My approach on these projects I'm working on is usually list, then parent article (which I understand can be quite unorthodox given the guidelines you mentioned). Pseud 14 (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough as long as the parent article is expanded per the other articles. FLCs normally take time to be approved so I would suggest that the expansion of the parent article also be started. Cowlibob (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Now that you mentioned it, I feel more inclined to re-nom this at a later time, once I've completed the expansion, as I did not want to rush the rework, usually takes me 4 to 6 weeks in draft, before I update the actual entry. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough as long as the parent article is expanded per the other articles. FLCs normally take time to be approved so I would suggest that the expansion of the parent article also be started. Cowlibob (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FLC director and delegates: In light of above discussion, I'd like to withdraw this nomination. If you would be so kind to archive please. Given that it has not attracted additional comments yet, I hope to re-nom at a later time once I've completed an expansion of the parent article, which is usually a 4 to 6 week undertaking for me. I may have another list that I feel ready to nominate instead. Thanks for your time and apologies for the invconvenience. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.