Wikipedia:Featured article review/TGV/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 17:40, 9 May 2008.
TGV edit
Review commentary edit
- Notified: Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains, Wikipedia:WikiProject France, User:Schutz , User:Slambo , User:Willkm
Just a quick skim over the article shows that there are very, very few references for an article of this size, and that many statements are unreferenced (criteria 1c). I don't think an article like this should be an FA. Noble Story (talk) 02:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Acknowledging that I have at least received the notice (thanks for the notice). I was involved in the original push to move this up to FA level; I haven't looked very closely at the text of this article since it was promoted. I will try to find time to return and fill it in with some more refs and clean it up as needed, but with school this week, I don't think I will have as much time as I would like. Slambo (Speak) 17:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c) and trivia (4). Marskell (talk) 10:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist I stand by my original comments. This is definitely not an example of Wikipedia's best work. Noble Story (talk) 11:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist unsourced, and we don't need lawsuits from the company because of any unsourced errors about their mishaps and accidents either. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove, too much unsourced hard data, external link farm, incorrectly formatted citations, and easily spotted MoS deficiencies (dashes) and ce issues (hyphens). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.