Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MilHistBot 3
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 21:00, Wednesday, February 21, 2018 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Perl
Source code available: User:MilHistBot/awards.pl
Function overview: Processes MilHist award nominations
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#Award instructions
Edit period(s): Daily
Estimated number of pages affected: Four per nomination. Usually only three or four nominations per month. Each affects MilHist nomination page, one of the MilHist award archives page (of which there are two), User talk page, and Bugle page of the month. So a year's worth of daily runs will affect the MilHist nomination page, two MilHist awards archive pages, approximately 36 user talk pages, and 12 issues of the Bugle, 51 pages in total.
Namespace(s): Wikipedia, Wikipedia talk, and User talk
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: (With links to Sandbox test) The Bot:
- Posts the award template on the user's talk page (in this test case, the Bot's own page) [1] (the typo has been corrected)
- Changes the nomination page (ie Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Awards) to indicate that the award was awarded. [2]
- Adds the award to the historical list (eg. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Awards/ACM) [3]
- Adds the award to next month's Bugle (eg. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/March 2018/Project news) [4]
Discussion
edit- Approved for trial (20 edits or 30 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. ~ Rob13Talk 06:50, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- {{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} did this trial complete? If so please post trial result and diffs here. — xaosflux Talk 14:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. Trial is now complete. The Bot awards run has been successful. It has correctly updated the awards [5], ACM [6] and Bugle [7] pages. A typo in the posts on User talk pages entry was corrected, and these have been correct since the first run eg. [8]. In all, the awards run has processed seven awards and 28 edits to 10 pages in 30 days. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that we only reached the 30-day mark yesterday, due to February being a short month. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. Trial is now complete. The Bot awards run has been successful. It has correctly updated the awards [5], ACM [6] and Bugle [7] pages. A typo in the posts on User talk pages entry was corrected, and these have been correct since the first run eg. [8]. In all, the awards run has processed seven awards and 28 edits to 10 pages in 30 days. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. Task approved. — xaosflux Talk 12:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.