August 2018

edit
 
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, ZimmermannKKK, does not meet our username policy.
Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.
You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Zimmermann901 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Accept reason:

ZimmermannKKK (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zimmermann901, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- RoySmith (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zimmermann901 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #22403 was submitted on Aug 19, 2018 16:52:51. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 16:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zimmermann901 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Bad math with Porcomaledetto. Maybe we are registered on one IP? If the unblock request declined you can block my editing ability on my talk page. No, I didn't any bad faith edits. Zimmermann901 (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

"Bad math" is certainly a novel rationale, but not convincing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:47, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zimmermann901 (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

What is your relationship with User:KornerMatrix? And CU doesn't just look at the IP address (can't elaborate any further), nor does it just look at the technical evidence.Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zimmermann901 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #22407 was submitted on Aug 19, 2018 20:23:38. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 20:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zimmermann901 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #22412 was submitted on Aug 20, 2018 13:44:16. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 13:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply