Zenawiki
Welcome edit
|
February 2018 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Villa Madre Cabrini. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Velella Velella Talk 10:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Velella, maybe you can help me understanding the issue. I am an historian and I have recently started making available on Wikipedia a trilingual page for each Vìlla in Genoa of historical significance. I do this applying a scientific research approach, accessing documents and utilizing the relevant secondary bibliography when available. I also go on site and make photos when possible, as well as researching historical photographic documentation when available. Said this, I’m new on Wikipedia and I may miss something here. Yesterday you marked the page and indeed it was a stub. Today I added some bibliography (more will come) and others also contributed. This Vìlla is of major historical and social significance for the quarter where it is located, both in the distant past, where it constituted one of the first non religious villas in the area (I will publish the maps shortly, I’m still figuring out the copyright), it has artistic and constructive significance, and has played a large aggregation role in the 20th century. Please help me get this right at the first time in the future and avoid writing pages that get marked. Many thanks for your advice Zenawiki (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Zenawiki (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- The crucial step is to clearly and unequivocally demonstrate that this is a notable building. Other Wikis in other languages may have lower thresholds for demonstrating notablity. Any casual reader should be able to read the opening paragraph and understand why this building is considered notable and not just interesting, and in the body of the article there should be clear demonstration of this notability using independent and reliable references. In cases like this, mere mentions of the Villa by various authors does not establish notability. Simply being old does not establish notability. There must be something that clearly says that in this part of Italy, this building stands out because......... I could not see that from the text. Velella Velella Talk 10:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, this is very clear. Now I understand why a simple translation between languages wouldn’t be enough. I will re-write the article in next days in this light. How can I get it verified and the tag removed once done, as I seem to understand that addressing the issue and removing the tag myself might not be the right approach Zenawiki (talk) 10:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Palazzo Doria Spinola) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating Palazzo Doria Spinola, Zenawiki!
Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Reviewed, well done!
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Proper attribution - copyright infringement - Villa delle Peschiere edit
Hi Zenaawiki, Greetings. Your creator of the page above is a copied and pasted in translation from Wiki IT ( see here [1]) to Wiki EN. Please note that proper attribution is require to the original authors - pls see WP:PATT. Please use your own words to add content next time to avoid copy right infringement. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Cassiopeia, I have contributed the text to both the Italian Wikipedia and English Wikipedia for the same entry, starting from original credited sources. Actually I have done this for other pages too: creating both pages or substantially improving the text with original research from reputable sources in one wiki, then writing the other wiki. Thus, I have not translated the pages but written them in parallel, as I’m bilingual. My goal is to ensure that every notable villa and palace in Genoa has a well written entry in English and Italian, based on research. How can avoid this issue in the future? Many thanks Zenawiki (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Zenawiki, Good day. Thank you for the info above and tag removed from article and talk page. If you do so on other pages in Wikipedia and you edit first in Wiki IT, do indicated in the talk page as you need and provide link. Secondly - indicated in the edit summary you are the same author as per Wiki IT before you save. Thank you very much for contribution to Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genoa: Le Strade Nuove and the system of the Palazzi dei Rolli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Zenawiki, Greetings. Ref #1 and #3 of the above page you created point to "page not found"- see here [2] and [3]. You might want to check if you cite the correct URL correctly. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:07, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- @CASSIOPEIA: Good evening Cassiopeia, I have fixed the links, thanks for spotting this! Zenawiki (talk) 20:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Zenawki, Good morning, Thank for sorting it out. Appropriate it. I have put 2 citation needed tags in the page. (1) there is no mention Via Balbi is a street is one of the Strade Nuove streets on the source and (2) "the Spanish crown financed the undertakings" is not found in the source as well. Also there are 2 inline citations from a book, kindly cite the "page" so the review could go to the page to verify the content instead of reading the whole book which I dont think any pattroller would do that :). By the way, I have been to Italy, it is a very beautiful country and would love to go back there again in the future. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 22:46, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- @CASSIOPEIA: Good evening Cassiopeia, I have added more references and text to the article. I will add more soon. I hope you get to visit Genoa when you go to Italy next, and find these articles useful :) Zenawiki (talk) 19:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Zenawiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
CS1 error on Magenta–Crocco elevator edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Magenta–Crocco elevator, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)