User talk:Zalgo/Archives2008/April
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion]] and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Soxred93 | talk bot 02:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Basketball Skegness
Unconstructive??? I was only updating the recent results!!!!! Why is updating the results 'unconstructive' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.11.210 (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Re
The program is called huggle its around on wikipedia some were you have to request it in order to use it ill look for the link when i can...
Thanks Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 03:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Nice its a good program i also use twinkle :)
Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 03:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Ill try that out thanks Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 03:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
vandals
When using {{subst:uw-vandal[1, 2, 3, 4, or 4im] | [page]}} please try to follow the escalation sequence. Otherwise the whole chain fails. Thanks.LeadSongDog (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. Looking closer at User_talk:66.125.69.74 I now realize there was a three-day gap. In the heat of battle it looked like a quick revert.LeadSongDog (talk) 22:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
MAOR KATZ!
.jpg)
.jpg)
... as you requested :) Raul654 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
hey
i met you on irc, i was goplay. --pdgator29talk 23:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
nice cookies lol they were yummy --pdgator29talk 23:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
cool ill take the archive bot--pdgator29talk 01:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism of my Talk page
Hi, I saw where you had reverted an edit to my talk page. Well the same person did it again, and added a comment to taunt me about the page I am watching. Can you please restore it back? I'm not sure if I can undo edits to my own talk page.Still learning Wiki ways. Thanks, Countrypaula (talk) 01:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Deletion tag
Hi - someone has tagged the page User:Cream/Test2 for speedy deletion. Looks like it was a test page - do you have any desire to hold on to the page?--Kubigula (talk) 04:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Check-in
Hey man, how's everything going? Need help with anything? GlassCobra 05:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Edits
I've managed 1581 edits in one month. I want to know if that's a record? In 2 months 2276 edits- is that? Chubbennaitor 18:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Assistance with possible sockpuppet and vandal
Hi, I am asking for help with a possible sockpuppet and vandalism on the article Kurt Lockwood. I believe it is either the same person or they are getting friends to disrupt this page with the same edits over and over.They didn't apply to the 3-RR. Please help. Countrypaula (talk) 16:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, This is obviously not Kurt Lockwood,based on comments made towards me on both our talk pages. Countrypaula (talk) 06:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to add my thanks to your swift handling of this issue! Claire999 (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks also for the honor.I commend you all for helping me with this is such a quick and professional manner.Countrypaula (talk) 23:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Notice
Dude what was wrong wid my edit OBTW Batista and Undertaker went to a count-out finish. The crowd were almost 100% behind Taker, Batista got a lot of boos all night. Edge and his geeks were at ringside. After the match, Taker pulled Edge over the rail and beat on him. The geeks came in, so did Chavo and his bodyguard but Big Dave and Taker fought them off. Vickie came out to so much heat and made a re-match for the World Title next week between Batista and the Undertaker Highlight Reel with Batista. Jericho talks about how Batista would have loved to have been the man to retire Flair, Batista gets pissed and hits Jericho with the Batista Bomb and leaves.
- Matt Hardy came down for commentary. Dreamer was in the ring awaiting MVP. MVP defeated Dreamer.
- Chavo (with his bodyguard) defeated Jamie Noble
- Big Show defeated Mark Henry via DQ after Khali came down. Post match Khali slammed the Big Show, was quite the sight live!
- Cherry defeated Victoria. This match was long and boring; the crowd did pop huge for the finish though.
- The Russian dude defeated Leroy Kidcade. Kidcade got a huge pop when they announced he was from London. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.143.137.214 (talk) 02:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Huggle
Why would I want to use huggle? I don't even know how to do that. Chubbennaitor 16:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya
Thanks for catching that warning for me. Cheers, Razorflame (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
anonymous edit to "Micromanagement"
Hi cream, you wrote me because of an anonymous edit. I am using a dialup account with an dynamic IP address. My edit to micromanagement is unrelated to the other edits complained for that address, and while I have contributed at least two hundred edits as Joise in the German Wikipedia, I lack an account in the english one. Please differentiate between the edit above and the earlier ones. Regarding the article on micromanagement, I've provided the Book by Harry Chambers as reference. I could cite verbally from that, but as I am actually confronted with the topic of the article, I urgently need to work on my job resumes. Please elaborate and explicate your concerns on the discussion page of that article, jointly with the deleted sentences. Thanks. --82.113.106.16 (talk) (Joise) —Preceding comment was added at 20:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism level
How does one when to update the vandalism level chart up or down? I'm just wondering, I don't intend on editing it. MalwareSmarts (talk) 00:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism on my talkpage
Hi, I think there is 1 more IP that needs checked into as far ar the sockpuppets. They just edited my talk page and deleted the Barnstar you gave me. This IP was one of the ones doing the vandalism before. Thanks, Countrypaula (talk) 03:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- The IP is 64.222.33.37 Thanks, Countrypaula (talk) 03:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your help.Countrypaula (talk) 03:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- The IP is 64.222.33.37 Thanks, Countrypaula (talk) 03:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
You're being watched
you need to read stuff before you revert
You are too quick with the buttons - don't revert back in copyright images to articles, don't just hit revert without considering what you are doing. --87.113.74.51 (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
explain to me how such unsourced and POV assertions such as this should remain in this article. "massively popular"?? "the explosion of the popularity of blogs..."??? "extremely popular"?? These are fluffy, weasely, unnecessarsily colorful, and unsourced. --70.107.123.229 (talk) 17:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Wrong reversion
I added an incorrect linking and you reversed? Stop randomly reverting.--83.251.29.124 (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Thill Sharief
Hiya i just upload the article without the lock so please review it and if you still think that there is something still need to be fixed then let me know before deleting the page.
Many Thanks
--raja 11:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Why I blanked that page
Hi I blanked that page because it is about a band that is only as successful as the next unsigned band and has no links to any articles on wikipedia. I've put it up for deletion many times but it keeps getting taken off by one of the band members. Is there a way we can get rid of it without those guys interfering? - 211.30.227.30 (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Take it up with an admin.--Mjr162006 (talk) 02:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello
I recently added rightful details and i don't see why it is unconstructive. i have added importand details and i think it is unfair that you delete what is important just to keep the article short, i suggest that you provide your actual reasons before you delete my contributions, thanks.87.194.75.159 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.75.159 actually i just created an account so my wiki name is btzkillerv
Thill Sharief
I try to make my article according to wikipedia rules but every time when i see my article its deleted. Can you tell me that whats wrong in my article that you delete it this time ...
and also can you guide me that who is administrator and who can put lock on the article. I thought that i contribute this article so i have a right to put lock on it, if i am wrong then please guide me and please please tell me that whats wrong i am doing in my article that my article is deleted again and again
Many thanks, raja 10:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Peg Entwistle
Hi. Thanks for helping with what's been going on in the last hour or so. All this came about within minutes after I posted on another website some comments critical of another writer's article about Peg Entwistle. I had mentioned I was a contributor to the Entwistle Wiki page. The person (s) who started changing and removing many of my edits also copied a portion of my article from the other site and created a "Disclaimer" on Entwistle's Wiki. The "Disclaimer" was a paragraph from the article on the other site, taken out of context, and then included on Wiki to humiliated me. I would never edit Wiki with the style or content I at times use on other, less professional sites--namely, sites where passion and emotion are expressed.
Thank you. James Zeruk Jr —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameszerukjr (talk • contribs) 20:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I believe a script of yours may have misidentified an edit made to List of states with nuclear weapons. An edit summary was provided and the edit was indeed constructive. Thanks, --68.72.46.218 (talk) 02:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Based on your talk page, I assume the script is still giving trouble. I'm going to go ahead and fix my edit again. Good luck trying to get it to work :) --68.72.46.218 (talk) 03:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Text of Order Update
I changed the text for a couple of reasons: 1) the currently viewed version has some errors in it when compared to the original as pictured in the citation. 2) the format I chose was to mirror the exact text for those who have a historical interest in how it was written, line-by-line. I apologize if I'm a little slow in getting it all doucmented and formated correctly, but this is my first effort to edit something that I know to be (slightly) inaccurate. When I getmy signature and other administrative links established, I'll return to submit them as well.
How is adding a external link title "unconstructive" ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
You are incorrect! My changes are not vandalism as quoted from the Wikipedia definition: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism." Know your rules before you "referee" someone else.
What on earth??!!!
MR. CREAM, this is VASCO from Portugal
Do you mind explaining your modus operandi, regarding reverting my hard work on ANGULO, CAÑIZARES AND ALBELDA (spanish footballers), saying it appeared vandalism and was unconstructive. I referenced everything...
Hoping to hear from you, VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Cheers!
Hi there CREAM, VASCO on the talk again.
False positive, happens to the best. Have a great weekend, from Portugal!!
VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 03:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
careful!
This revert was improper; I've restored. —Steve Summit (talk) 03:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism (MU330)
Oh, I reverted to a vandalized version. Shows what I get for editing at 3 in the morning. =\ Nokmar (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Longcat.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Longcat.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Creamy!Talk 18:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I've declined your report to WP:AIV and removed it. By all means give them a uw-create warning, but a test4 on top for creating one inappropriate page, then reporting them to WP:AIV for blanking the page (which most new users think is sufficient to delete it) is a bit bitey. Thanks. GBT/C 21:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's partly about the warning and partly about the report to WP:AIV - does Huggle do that automatically too (I've never used it, myself)? If so, then something's wrong - there had been no vandalism past final warning, so there shouldn't have been a report to WP:AIV in the first place. Do you chose the level of warning to give the user? If so, I'd suggest spending a bit of time getting back in touch with the various levels of create1, 2, 3, etc., and test1, 2, 3 - for first edits, unless the article is clearly inappropriate, then at best a create3 should be used, and most probably a create2. On top of that, two warnings shouldn't be issued for the same edit. Thanks. GBT/C 13:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Huggle does that on a semi automatic basis, it checks the talk page often when warning a user. If you want a copy of Huggle, i can give you and bypassing gurch's email --Creamy!Talk 13:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I'm a Mac person, myself... The public face of GBT/C 14:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Huggle does that on a semi automatic basis, it checks the talk page often when warning a user. If you want a copy of Huggle, i can give you and bypassing gurch's email --Creamy!Talk 13:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
How about minding your own business?
I like that idea better! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.210.32.96 (talk) 22:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Problem with revert to Xbox
Hi Cream. I'm sure it was accidental, but this revert to Xbox actually reverted vandalism back into the article. You might want to take a bit more care with your reverts in the future. Best, Gwernol 01:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)