Your submission at Articles for creation: Enos Mafokate (June 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Enos Mafokate has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Enos Mafokate. Thanks! Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 00:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Enos Mafokate has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Enos Mafokate. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enos Mafokate (July 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Daniel kenneth (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Yqzuvwj, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Daniel kenneth (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Michelle Williams (actress) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Serendipity (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply