May 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Takbir without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Christianity in Egypt seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Christianity in Egypt. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Christianity in Egypt, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Christianity in Egypt. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • I don't agree that it was vandalism, but it was a disruptive edit: it misused the lead section of the article, and it editorialized on the basis of biased sources. Please desist from this sort of editing and better familiarize yourself with our policy and guidelines regarding sources and neutrality. signed, Rosguill talk 14:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Brother Christians use the Arabic word الرب during religious prayers and rarely use the word Allah. I don’t know why you keep banning me for no reason? Youssefa82718 (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Takbir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. M.Bitton (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I understand your stance, but having a 2019 estimates isn’t the right thing. I was being as neutral as possible and even mentioned the fact the Coptic Church figures might be inflated for political reasons in the demographics section.
And regarding the lead section, can you explain to me what I did wrong? I made sure to keep all the templates previously available.
Thanks again Youssefa82718 (talk) 14:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The issue with the lead section is that you ignored the structure of the existing article in your changes. Please see WP:LEAD--the lead should be a summary of the rest of the article, not a place to introduce novel editorialization. The additional text included concessions and caveats, but overall served to editorialize in favor of Pope Tawadros's views over those of cited RS. signed, Rosguill talk 14:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply