Youssefa82718

May 2024

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Takbir without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Christianity in Egypt seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Christianity in Egypt. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Christianity in Egypt, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Christianity in Egypt. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

• I don't agree that it was vandalism, but it was a disruptive edit: it misused the lead section of the article, and it editorialized on the basis of biased sources. Please desist from this sort of editing and better familiarize yourself with our policy and guidelines regarding sources and neutrality. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Brother Christians use the Arabic word الرب during religious prayers and rarely use the word Allah. I don’t know why you keep banning me for no reason? Youssefa82718 (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Takbir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. M.Bitton (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I understand your stance, but having a 2019 estimates isn’t the right thing. I was being as neutral as possible and even mentioned the fact the Coptic Church figures might be inflated for political reasons in the demographics section.

And regarding the lead section, can you explain to me what I did wrong? I made sure to keep all the templates previously available.

Thanks again Youssefa82718 (talk) 14:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

The issue with the lead section is that you ignored the structure of the existing article in your changes. Please see WP:LEAD--the lead should be a summary of the rest of the article, not a place to introduce novel editorialization. The additional text included concessions and caveats, but overall served to editorialize in favor of Pope Tawadros's views over those of cited RS. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Coptic Orthodox Church—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Youssefa82718, can you please explain why you made the above identified edit? You appear to be directly contradicting what RS say about this topic. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)