Your submission at Articles for creation: Clashes around Zujince (May 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Klinetalkcontribs 20:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Wrweewfw! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Klinetalkcontribs 20:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Wrweewfw, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Attack on Teslić to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 18:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Slavko Lisica. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Your edit to Storming of the presidential palace in Grozny has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

Destruction of Chechen aviation moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Destruction of Chechen aviation. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Operation Star

edit

Do NOT replace an existing, legitimate article with your own material, which should be named Operation Star 94 anyway. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I moved that new article to Operation Star 94. Clarityfiend is correct: every different topic, even with same name, gets its own page and you cannot simply erase an existing page: WP:OVERWRITE is not allowed. DMacks (talk) 02:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Offensive on Kijevo

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Offensive on Kijevo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Offensives on Velika Kladuša moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Offensives on Velika Kladuša. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 21:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Attacks on Lučane moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Attacks on Lučane. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply