Monica Larner edit

Hi, I made these changes. You shouldn't have url links in the body of the text, if you want links to the Italian sites I've removed, put them in your "External links" section (note capitalisation of the headings). I've also removed her father's film credits, they are not about her, and his notability isn't transferable. Any other queries let me know. I've deleted Monica Larner so you should be able to move the article there (use the "move" tab, don't cut-and-paste). Let me know if any problems, good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

A pic would be good, but check Fair Use carefully. I'm no expert, but I seem to remember that there is a problem with FU for living people, in that it's theoretically possible to make a free image. If that's the case, it might be worth seeing if her publisher might release an image through OTRS Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File moving edit

You have successfully moved files, but only admins can move files to an article title that already exists, since it involves deletion of the other file.

See Luis Gutiérrez (disambiguation). In this case, you could

  • rename your man to Luis Gutiérrez (oenologist) or similar, add to the disamb too
  • request that the politician be moved to Luis Gutiérrez (US representative) so you can move your man to his space (a bad idea unless you think your man is by far the most famous bearer of the name)
  • rename your man and request that the politician be moved (so that Luis Gutiérrez can become just a disambiguation page). This depends whether you think his occupation of the slot is just US-centricity, and he is no more notable that the others.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree files edit

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 21#OTRS pending since September. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Monica Larner for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monica Larner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Larner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 23:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Suspected sockpuppetry edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WineDWS. Thank you. Msnicki (talk)

December 2013 edit

  Hello, WineDWS. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Monica Larner, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Jeb Dunnuck Promotional Photo.jpeg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jeb Dunnuck Promotional Photo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply