Welcome!

edit

Hello, Wikireverse-ho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Doug Weller talk 11:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Slovenia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch 05:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Verifiability. (CC) Tbhotch 05:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

You're wrong, you must use sources

edit

WP:VERIFY " Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations." --Doug Weller talk 11:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


YOU MUST NOT! This wiki is TERRIFYING. Promoting policies, annoying users, not showing good stuff in sister projects...! --Wikireverse-ho (talk) 03:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stop it, you two! It's time to do good stuff, not blaming my friend with the username Wikireverse-ho! --Meshimeshikoko (talk) 09:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

LET ME DO MY OWN!

edit

Wikipedia is the worst encyclopedia. Au revoir, minors!

Don't worry, my big both ninja and friend. We'll fnnd a wey to stop those minors. --Meshimeshikoko (talk) 09:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
You were awarded a Special Barnstar! Meshimeshikoko (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikireverse-ho. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 16:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply