User talk:Wiki-psyc/Archive 1

Possibly unfree File:Games People Play cover 1964.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Games People Play cover 1964.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 04:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Glad we were able to use it. Wiki-psyc (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eric Berne may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• During World War II, Berne served as a psychiatrist in the Army Medical Corps )from 1943-46), starting as a First Lieutenant and rising to Major. His assignments included Spokane, Washington,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Thankyou, Bot! Wiki-psyc (talk) 14:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Editing Template:Infobox psychiatry theory

Hello, Wiki-psyc. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Editing Template:Infobox psychiatry theory, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lucky102 (talk) 23:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Wiki-psyc (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Re pages Berny and Berny (disambiguation)

See WP:DABNAME: "The title of a disambiguation page is the ambiguous term itself, provided there is no primary topic for that term. If there is a primary topic, then the tag "(disambiguation)" is added to the name of the disambiguation page, as in Jupiter (disambiguation)."

So the page should be called Berny – you proposed deletion of the wrong one. You shouldn't have edited Berny (disambiguation) – it needs to be a redirect, in accordance with WP:HOWTODAB. I have changed it back to a redirect. But I am not allowed (as page author) to remove your Speedy Deletion tag on Berny. Please remove it. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Best regards — Hebrides (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Someone beat me to it. Thanks for the policy explanation. We're good. Thanks. Wiki-psyc (talk) 14:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Skyscraper

The talk page section has not reached consensus for the merge. I will comment there but have reverted your edit because it does not add anything to the article and in parts adds unimportant detail Robynthehode (talk) 21:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

AfD

Request to revisit the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piff the Magic Dragon per sources presented therein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion about personal boundaries

Discussion about personal boundaries here Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Editor_not_playing_ball_by_insisting_on_controversial_renaming_without_using_WP:REQMOVE --Penbat (talk) 15:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Discussion now moved to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Editor_not_playing_ball_by_insisting_on_controversial_renaming_without_using_WP:REQMOVE --Penbat (talk) 09:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Joshua Federico for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Federico is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Federico until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. Wiki-psyc (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

• just fyi, page creators are allowed to iVote keep delete' and so forth at deletion discussions. Cheer.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:11, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Simply for contributing to Wikipedia a while ago, while your banner says you haven't for a while. Absurd, but relatable. Keep it up, I mean that in both ways! InedibleHulk (talk) 05:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Megalomania (disambiguation)

Hi Wiki-psyc, my finger hit 'publish changes' before I finished my edit summary on Megalomania (disambiguation), so I decided to finish here. I reverted your edit for two reasons: redirects are used when the DAB title differs from the primary topic title (per MOS:DABPRIMARY) and references aren't used on DAB pages. Leschnei (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. Wiki-psyc (talk) 03:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Gaslighting while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I will be mindful to log in when editing. Wiki-psyc (talk) 11:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Good input — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:582:C000:4500:DDF6:A9A7:9E41:36E7 (talk) 05:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to Narcissistic personality disorder has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (Chat) 14:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

@Sennecaster: I'm in the process of cleaning up the Narcissistic injury article and I lifted that copy and moved it to the Narcissistic personality disorder. I read through it to be sure it made sense, but I did not think to check it for copyright. I should have noted that in the edit notes. What tool are you using to check for copyright violations? That would be helpful tool to have. Wiki-psyc (talk) 15:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your edit was flagged by EranBot, which supplies the Copypatrol tool, both of which uses the TurnItIn API to compare articles against text. The content was copied from Narcissistic injury, and then copied into the NPD article, if I understand correctly what you are saying. Therefore, it would need an attribution, per WP:PATT. However, it looks like content was also merged from Narcissistic rage and narcissistic injury first, so that will have to be attributed too (can be done through null edits to the article content was copied to). Aside from that, I think I also saw the amount of quoting and reverted partially on that; my rule of proper quote amount is less than half of a section is proper; the essay WP:COPYQUOTE is extremely good, and while it is just an essay, it does adequately summarize thoughts on the usage of quotes. Due to all of the merging, that isn't necessarily your fault, but something to make you aware of. :) Sennecaster (Chat) 16:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

@Sennecaster: Exteremely helpful. So my question would be, should we (I) resurrect that copy and document it on the talk page or leave things as they are. I don't want to be disrespectful to another editors work. Wiki-psyc (talk) 16:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

All that is needed is a null edit that says something like Content from [[Diff of revision you copied from in article 1|name of article 1]] was copied into [[Name of article 2]] with [[Diff of revision you copied text into article 2 with|this diff]], please see that page for attribution. These would go on article 2. However, you can also add {{Copied}} to the talk pages of articles in question; User:Chlod/Scripts/CopiedTemplateEditor is extremely good at doing this, and can even create the attribution edit summary for you. Sennecaster (Chat) 16:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)