User talk:WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives/2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Newslinger in topic Another Chance

Wellthisistherepaer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 

Hi Wellthisistherepaer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ravikant Shukla.jpg

 

A tag has been placed on File:Ravikant Shukla.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-new-zealand-2016-17/content/image/262727.html?object=33331;dir=next. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pokémon Go Battle League has been accepted

 
Pokémon Go Battle League, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- RichT|C|E-Mail 17:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Uno Flip Cover.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Uno Flip Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Asia Cup (October 13)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 05:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Card Features

What do you mean by a "card feature", here? --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

It is for features on card games --WellThisIsTheReaper 19:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand what you mean - what's a feature on a card game? A special type of card like the "skip a turn" in Uno (the only game you've added to the category)? A card game that's had films or documentaries made about it? --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Yes --WellThisIsTheReaper 19:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Which of those two things? --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
The Skip in Uno --WellThisIsTheReaper 19:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for clarifying. That's already covered by Category:Dedicated deck card games, so I'll raise a discussion on it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I did not know that. You may delete then, --WellThisIsTheReaper 19:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Is your Category:App Features a similar situation here? What's an app feature and why is Pokemon Go Battle League the only app to have one? --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

No, it is a diffrent situation. App Features category includes articles which focuses mainly on the different types of features included in a app. --WellThisIsTheReaper

Category:Card Features has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Card Features has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uno Flip has been accepted

 
Uno Flip, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sagotreespirit (talk) 13:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:App Features has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:App Features has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Unblock Request

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As you know, I have contributed to Wikipedia in lots of good ways. So, why out of the blue? I don't who TechnoBladeSPX is, and if you are talking about me ALONE... you can check my user page as to why I had to create this second account. Also, I have over 535+ edits, and I have done my best to stop vandalism such as, on Kevin de Bruyne, WhiteHat Jr. and Adam Sanford. I have done everything the right way. I started out all my articles as drafts, and all the articles I published were when they were reviewed, such as Zxcvbnm, Rich and Sagotreespirit. Please unblock me. I have not done anything wrong. I do not understand anything right now. I have many drafts waiting to be published, and-I believe I make a point-Wikipedia has a long way to be a fully, finished encyclopedia. Check my statistics for all I care. I just want to help Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a fully-grown community, and if I may-still needs to improve. That is all from me now. I hope you will, PLEASE unblock me.

Decline reason:

  Confirmed sock puppet. Appeal the block on your original account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@NinjaRobotPirate: I cannot. I trashed my other computer which I used for Ohmyitsthereaper and I do not remember my password for my original account. Can you please, please, please, PLEASE unblock me?
Also, my IP is a shared one. So, if you are mistaking me for TechnoBladeSPX, then you are mistaken.

Unblock Request 2

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As you know, I have contributed to Wikipedia in lots of good ways. So, why out of the blue? I don't who TechnoBladeSPX is, and if you are talking about me ALONE... you can check my user page as to why I had to create this second account. Also, I have over 535+ edits, and I have done my best to stop vandalism such as, on Kevin de Bruyne, WhiteHat Jr. and Adam Sanford. I have done everything the right way. I started out all my articles as drafts, and all the articles I published were when they were reviewed, such as Zxcvbnm, Rich and Sagotreespirit. Please unblock me. I have not done anything wrong. I do not understand anything right now. I have many drafts waiting to be published, and-I believe I make a point-Wikipedia has a long way to be a fully, finished encyclopedia. Check my statistics for all I care. I just want to help Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a fully-grown community, and if I may-still needs to improve. That is all from me now. I hope you will, PLEASE unblock me. Also, I can't appeal on my other account, since I trashed me other computer and I do not remember my password for my original account.

Decline reason:

Based on edit patterns and checkuser's evidence, this appears to be a clear case of sockpuppetry. only (talk) 02:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another Chance

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. As I have looked back on my past mistakes, I have realised my many mistakes on Sockpuppetry. This is why I pledge (vow) to never repeat this mistake on abusively using multiple accounts. Apart from my other accounts, this account has been different, and I believe you can say the same. I will try to NEVER do this again. And, if I do, well any admin can block me without question, and I won't appeal. I will also try never to create a different account which in any way is a case of Sockpuppetry. I am incredibly sorry everyone for abusively using multiple accounts. Sorry. Please unblock me. I will never, EVER repeat this measly mistake. WellThisIsTheReaper (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given your very recent history of sockpuppetry, please wait at least six months before appealing, and use this time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. After at least six months without sockpuppetry or block evasion, an unblock request may be accepted under the standard offer at an administrator's discretion. If you still have access to the TechnoBladeSPX account, please submit future unblock requests at User talk:TechnoBladeSPX. — Newslinger talk 05:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.