January 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Waterloo Road episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Wajenkins, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Wajenkins! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Power Rangers Ninja Storm, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Waterloo Road Reunited episodes

edit

The edits you are making to Waterloo Road Reunited are incorrect, and I have reverted them time and time again. The episodes are 1-6, not 95.5-100.5, as they are not, repeat NOT part of Series 6. They are a part of a spin-off series, completely separate from the main series chronology. As I have stated, I have had to change this time and time again, however, if you persist in reverting it to the previous, I will have no choice but to report your editing to moderators as vandalism, and as a result you could receive a ban. 80.47.52.235 (talk) 18:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015

edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to The Rolling Stones does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mlpearc (open channel) 15:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. –Davey2010Talk 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • You've constantly been disruptive on most of WR articles lately and I suggest you pack it in otherwise you'll be on a one way ticket out of here!,
I'm giving you a final warning as I've noticed an IP has warned you more than once via edit summaries and you've continued,
If you can't edit here in a constructive manner I suggest you find something better to do instead of wasting our time!
Thank you!. –Davey2010Talk 00:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Personnel sections on album articles

edit

I have reverted every one of your edits on album articles. Simple reason: you failed to provide edit summaries or any valid reason for changing the order of musicians. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Colour and the Shape, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robvanvee 16:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melrose Place (Season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Wagner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Wajenkins. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Wajenkins. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Tremonti Dust album cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Tremonti Dust album cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply