Vzuloaga

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Loesche GmbH.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 00:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Vzuloaga, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Orphaned non-free image File:Loesche Group Organization Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loesche Group Organization Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loesche GmbH, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consulting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vzuloaga. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Refratechnik Holding GmbH (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Refratechnik Holding GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Refratechnik Holding GmbH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

MER-C 16:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Unblock appeal

Dear administrator, I am contacting you with the purpose of appealing the recent blockage that Wikipedia has applied to my account. I have read and understood the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements that govern Wikipedia and that have been made available to me through the following link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure#Wikimedia_Foundation_Terms_of_Use. Although I now understand the reasons that have led to the blocking of my personal account as an editor on Wikipedia, I would like to clarify that I have not received any compensation for the content posted on my Talk Page and that the articles have never been written with the intention of causing any damage or disruption to Wikipedia. More specifically, with regards to the article "Loesche GmbH", I would like to clarify that I have never been compensated by any person, group, company, or organization to write or edit the article or to use or post the article on Wikipedia to promote their interests.

I acknowledge that once I read Wikipedia´s Conflict of Interest (COI) Terms I understood why it was assumed that I might have received financial compensation for writing and publishing the article since, at the time, I was an employee at a Spanish subsidiary company of the mother company Loesche GmbH, located in Germany, which I wrote about to provide a little insight of its history and evolution. Nevertheless, the truth is had I known that I was incurring a potential conflict of interest according to the terms established by Wikipedia I would have refrained from this publication.

However, I wrote that article without knowing that I was violating an essential requirement of Wikipedia and I would like to clarify that I was not asked or paid to write and publish the article, I did it voluntarily since there was not much information on the internet about the company. Also, after several years, I have made a couple of short edits with the aim of properly continuing my task as a contributor in a voluntary manner.

According to the above, I wish to confirm that my intention has not been, and will not be, to edit or create articles for advertising purposes in the future. However, I would like to request if it would be possible to consider removing the violation of Wikipedia’s terms of use notice from the article since my personal error of not disclosing my employment status at the time should not be a reason to compromise a company´s good name and reputation.

Thank you very much for your attention and consideration in this matter.

Best Regards. Vzuloaga (talk) 11:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

For an administrator to review your request, you need to follow the instructions in the block notice to use the proper template. 331dot (talk) 13:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Bookkeeping

If you will let me know which pages you have edited for pay, and who your employer and client were for that project, I will add an appropriate Template:connected contributor (paid) template to those articles' talk pages.

Likewise, if you will let me know about any edits you made which come under the WP:Conflict of interest guideline but which were not paid, I will put Template:connected contributor on the talk pages of those articles.

A list of your non-deleted edits can be found at Special:Contributions/Vzuloaga. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 18:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Template update request

The article page is Loesche GmbH. I was an employee of the subsidiary company Loesche Latinoamericana during the creation and first edits of the article. However, I would like to clarify that I didn't receive any additional payment other than being an employee of the subsidiary company, and I understand this is where the Conflict of Interest applies.

The latest edits in 2016 were made after leaving the company but at that time I had started working as an external consultant. Although I didn't receive any payments for these edits on this occasion either, I understand that my relationship with the company also applies as a Conflict of Interest.

If you need any additional information please let me know.

Thank you so much for your assistance!

All the best.Vzuloaga (talk) 08:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Follow up

Good afternoon,

I'm following up to see if you need any additional information from my side after the latest talk update on Loesche GmbH article page. I understand that a "connected contributor (paid)" was decided to be the appropriate template to use for all cases involving this article.

In the meantime, are there any additional steps o relevant information that you might need?

Thank you so much!Vzuloaga (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

I received your email. You were probably unaware of it, but it's generally against the rules to edit "on behalf of" or, by extension, collaborate with blocked editors. Even if it weren't against the rules, it would be "in bad form" for me to edit on behalf of or collaborate with a blocked editor.

Instructions for requesting an unblock are in the box above. Bear in mind that administrators are not obliged to unblock you.

If you are unblocked, you can "ping" me to get my attention. See Wikipedia:Notifications for instructions.

Also, as a rule, I prefer to collaborate "on-wiki" and not use email for that purpose (obviously, that preference does not apply to certain administrative-type communications which may require privacy). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Follow up II

Thank you, David, and my apologies as I don't know how communication on Wikipedia works in this kind of situation.

Although being unblocked would be a plus, my only intention is to make things clear about the article Loesche GmbH.

In any case, I really appreciate your guidance and time.

All the best.

Vzuloaga (talk) 10:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Instructions for requesting an unblock are in the pinkish-colored box several messages above this one. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Refratechnik Holding GmbH

Hello, Vzuloaga. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Refratechnik Holding GmbH, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Refratechnik Holding GmbH

Hello, Vzuloaga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Refratechnik Holding GmbH".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)