User talk:Vivek ji123/Archive 1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by JarrahTree in topic ok

User name

edit

As long as you are editing as Vivek ji123 than your user page and user talk page should be on that name. If you wish to start editing as Vivek srivastava, follow the instructions here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC) satyajeet jenaReply

Your comment on my talk page

edit

Please see my response to your comment on my talk page and the further questions that I have asked you there. Voceditenore (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS💬 03:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivek ji123 (talkcontribs) Reply

Proposed deletion of Ban Kar Hawa

edit
 

The article Ban Kar Hawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG. No indication of notability, only mentions are on YouTube videos and streaming sites like Amazon and Spotify. Have tried searching in Hindi as well and found nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richard3120 (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I take issue with a recent speedy delete item

edit

The editor as a 3 edit history - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Miadardengo - that is, if you haven got it's a new user see below... with no sign of recent edits - that should (a) assume WP:AGF and some effort to help to assist while in draft space - not a speedy delete.

(b) please try to check things like edit count and other factors, the editor as a new editor is unlikely to know even the most basic understandings of what draft space is about, let alone CSD - the notion of dont bite newcomers would be well worth having a close read.

I strongly suggest you review your reasonings for even venturing into draft space and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lynley_Wallis If you didnt get bitten when you first started, you are a rare case - try understanding and reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers. Thank you. JarrahTree 04:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

please

edit

take time to learn how wikipedia works before even trying csd or eventhinking about asking for any other privileges - just get basic editing first. it takes time, it takes patience, just take it slowly... JarrahTree 05:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)  Thanks for this information Vivek ji123 (talk) 10:39 am ,17 March2020 (UTC).Reply

But the time can also involved a lot of slips and trips, there are many things to get a handle on, just have patience and hope other editors are able to help you. JarrahTree 05:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

ok

edit

basic problem - is that the WP:NOTABILITY is not met at all - unless you can find substantially more WP:RS - any new article reviewer will say, lacks notability - I am sorry I cannot help you, as I would need to have an Indian language like Hindi to see if there were more sources, but 2 sources and the text so far, it does not meet even a basic level article. Maybe have a look around at other articles that already exist about Indian singers - have a look at how they are notable or meet basic standards... JarrahTree 10:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am   Sorry! that no one likes the articles I have made, I am going to stop editing on Wikipedia from yesterday. I am happy that I spent 6 months editing on Wikipedia, nice to talk to you.Vivek ji123 (talk)4:09 pm 18 March2020 (UTC).

surely a wrong way to respond - you might well know of something you can edit - you need to have a lot of patience and understand it takes time - try finding something you can improve rather than create - it could really change the way you think about things...

if you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_India_articles - there must be something in that large group of articles you might be able to edit or improve... then it might give you an understanding as to how things in wikipedia work... JarrahTree 10:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply