Vishakavijayakumar

Please leave me comments with your signature , Thank you Vishakavijayakumar (talk) 03:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Reward dependence

I've just been looking at this article as part of the review process as DYK and there appear to fairly large pieces of text copied from a series of copyrighted sources with minimal changes. Please see the examples from these sources [1], [2] and [3] as shown here, [4], [5] & [6]. These need to be sorted out quickly or the article may be reverted back to its state before you started the expansion - please see WP:COPYVIO. Thanks, Mikenorton (talk) 20:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your feedback on this article. I had a look at all of the duplication detection reports and have made all of the necessary changes to avoid copyright violations. I did notice that several of the duplications the reports mention are journal article titles, which I cannot do anything about. Also, there are several psychological and psychiatric terms that I will have to use as is and cannot be rephrased. There were also a few words/phrases that the reports mention, that have not been plagiarized, yet the report has just copied out similar wordings as duplicates. I did not fix those. The large pieces of texts that seem to have been copied, I did go in and fix them. I was under the impression that, just as in other articles we may write, if these were placed under quotations and cited that these should be ok. I apologize for the misunderstanding. I have fixed them all. Hopefully now the article meets all of the Wikipedia criteria. Please do review the article once more and please do let me know if anything else needs fixing. I want to provide a good quality and informative article on this topic. Thanks! Vishakavijayakumar (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Of course not all of the matches were relevant to possible copyright violation, but with each source there was at least one sizeable section that was all but identical. I see that you've reworded most of them - I'll take a further look tomorrow (it's late evening here now) and let you know what I think. Thanks for getting onto this so quickly. Note that it's not always enough to reword a sentence if you retain the original sentence structure. We're all fairly new at this and trying to learn what is and what is not OK; I had one that I reviewed pulled off the main page, because of too close paraphrasing problems, so I'm being pretty careful now. Mikenorton (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I've given the nomination the OK now, but I would appreciate it if you changed all that bolding in the body of the article to italics before it gets to the main page, thanks, Mikenorton (talk) 23:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

I have removed all of the bolding and italicized very minimally. Thank you so much for all this help. Being a first-timer on here, it certainly helps to have feedback such as this for us rookies to learn the ropes. Sorry for any trouble I may have caused. Vishakavijayakumar (talk) 01:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

No trouble at all, we were all beginners once. Mikenorton (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Reward dependence

Orlady (talk) 22:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 16:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC)