VinDel24, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi VinDel24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome

edit

Hello, VinDel24, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! SeoR (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, and again welcome. Your contributions are already helping, as for example re. Deansgrange. Please be a little cautious with sources like Lewis, and lists such as those of houses of Kill o'the Grange and Dun Laoghaire - Lewis is great, and can very much help to grow hundreds of articles, but his work is a snapshot of one point in time, and the lists of houses are not appropriate to general locality articles, unless said houses are notable over an extended period, or are real features today. Thanks for citing, and for attentive writing; if there is the odd slip of capitals or grammar, someone will generally help soon. Good luck! SeoR (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lewis

edit

Hi. And welcome. A couple of quick notes:

  1. Lewis is a useful resource. But there is no reason to copy/paste large tracts of Lewis's 1837 work into articles. Wikipedia is not a mirror/republisher of other sources, is not a directory of people/houses/stuff (either from today or 200 years ago), and is not an indiscriminate collection of random information (without context or relevance). In short: stop doing things like this please.
  2. Lewis is a largely reliable resource. But there is no reason to treat Lewis as some kind of immutable/gospel source. To the extent that everything contained within it is concrete fact. If relying or quoting from Lewis, then make sure it is clear that this is what is happening. In short: stop doing things like this please.
  3. Lewis is not the only source. And is nearly 200 years old. There is no way that it can or should be used to describe things that are present tense. (Like saying there are "Goshawks nesting on Ireland's Eye", and stating as much while relying ENTIRELY on a source that was written when Jesus was a boy. Goshawks were rendered all but extinct in Ireland during the 19th century, so declaring that they are [now] nesting close to Dublin would need something far more reliable and current than something written 200 years ago.) In short: stop adding stuff like this please.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Ww2censor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kilmacanogue, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This article already has too few sources. You can readd this if you provide reliable sources. ww2censor (talk) 18:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply