Victoria & Landmarks

If you're here about an article that I declined/rejected please read these quick rules first...or you might be ignored.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disney Holes (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disney Holes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Disney Holes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Victoria & Landmarks! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 05:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Question on Teahouse

Hi, you made a section titled "Assistance" without offering any more information, which I have reverted. Please use the giant Ask a question! button and fill in the subject/headline and body of your question. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disney Holes (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JzG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disney Holes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Disney Holes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Guy (help!) 05:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, I'm Tenryuu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Vibease have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Please do not remove COI templates without discussing and reaching a consensus beforehand. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Kindly stop misrepresenting yourself to others. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 07:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 07:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Disney Holes

Draft:Disney Holes, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Disney Holes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Disney Holes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (help!) 07:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Disney Holes

Wikipedia:Disney Holes, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Disney Holes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Disney Holes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 07:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Disney Holes. TheImaCow (talk) 07:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Victoria & Landmarks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It was a school project Victoria & Landmarks (talk) 07:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Mz7 (talk) 08:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.