Welcome!

edit
Hello, VicIlongo, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

October 2012

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Iloilo has been reverted.
Your edit here to Iloilo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.weebly.com/weebly/main.php) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your edits on Hiligaynon language

edit

Do take note that I undid some of your edits at Hiligaynon language because the source that you used is a self-published one, in this case, a blog. Information from reliable, secondary sources are usually desired when editing articles. Please take time to read as well Wikipedia policies on identifying reliable sources, original research and verifiability. Xeltran (talk) 17:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Update You have reverted my edits with content that is unsourced. You replaced the Bacolodnon section with new information without corresponding sources. The previous Bacolodnon section was clearly verifiable, while the information you introduced looks like original material. Do you have any reliable source to back those up? Xeltran (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits on Iloilo City

edit

Hello! Please take the time to read Wikipedia policies on WP:VERIFIABILITY, WP:NPOV, WP:No original research. I've reverted some of your edits such as this one not only because it was unsourced, but also because it was "original research" and non-neutral. I've also removed your addition of "record holder" on the section title as per your edit here, as per WP:WORDS.Please take the time to cite supporting sources to substantiate information especially statistics. Cheers! Xeltran (talk) 08:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

It would really be helpful if you can cite sources regarding your edit here. Where are your sources? I do not want to engage in an edit war. Please also take note of WP:3RR. Xeltran (talk) 08:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Iloilo City shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Xeltran (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bacolod City

edit

Please take note that I reverted your edits on the Bacolod City article because you removed information that was clearly supported by references or introduced material that was not cited by the accompanying sources. Xeltran (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is User:VicIlongo reported by User:Xeltran (Result: ). Thank you. —Xeltran (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

VicIlongo, it is possible you may be blocked due to the complaint at WP:AN3#User:VicIlongo reported by User:Xeltran (Result: ). It might help your case if you choose to respond at the noticeboard. The fact that you are reverting the article without ever having commented at Talk: Iloilo City may be counted against you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Iloilo City. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Hiligaynon language has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. source: http://ilongo.weebly.com/iloilo-history-part-1.html Bbb23 (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I have increased the length of your block because of block evasion. If you persist, you will be indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit