June 2014 edit

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You may not copy text from copyrighted sources. If you wish to add or change material in the Shomrim article, please use your own words and make sure to cite your sources.Roscelese (talkcontribs) 05:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm trying to add stuff to a wiki article, I'm not having too much luck with the technicalities, please recommend an article that explains the process

Reference Errors on 7 June edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

VarifiedEditor, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi VarifiedEditor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Edit on Hatzolah edit

Hi I reverted your revert as there are no exemptions on private ambualnce servcies using blue lights/sirens except AFAIK being under the instruction of someone such as a Doctor or other person qualified who can allow you to run them. But it still sadly, as in the judges coments, is illegal to do so as a volunteer service SRV DMA type situation. I've also just thought about how they gain insurance for blue light runs without being asked to do so by a public body or a self insured situation.

Edit: Also the wiki page i linked to vehicle equipment in the United Kingdom] shows a good example of the sources and references.

As far as I understand, the law includes any vehicle that transports patients (Ambulances), including private companies. The issue was only relating to the use of other vehicles. Therefore your wording is misleading. --VarifiedEditor (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
As I see it the law relates to bodies allowed to use blue lights, for instance if I purchased an ambulance off ebay I would not be allowed to use blue lights (and sirens) on the road. the article I linked to says "The judges agreed that their use by civilians was in breach of road traffic regulations, but suggested that there might be scope for Parliament to change the rules. " which overrides the earlier decision to exempt them by a magistrate. --81.174.185.94 (talk) 04:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I hope you do well on Wikipedia edit

Shomrim page edit

Rosceles agrees with me as long as I don't put down other organizations. please undo your revisionJoelBuchbinder (talk) 21:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, VarifiedEditor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, VarifiedEditor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply