Vandhi04
Vandhi04, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Vandhi04! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi there, in this edit I redirected Googly 2 to Googly (film). There was no effort made to establish that the film had begun principal photography, which must be done for an upcoming film. Per WP:NFF:
Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun.
(Emphasis theirs)
If you can establish (with references) that principal photography has begun, the article may be restored. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Vandhi04 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was misinformed. Sorry. Hereafter I will be careful and publish only verified content
Decline reason:
You are blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. You must address this in any unblock request. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vandhi04 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
you have blocked me indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts.actually i created another wikpedia account for my new mail id.but you have accused of me of abusing multiple accounts.whatever articles i create has proofs and references.then only i create an article itself.i dont know what mistake i did.iam new to wikipedia and not familiar with the terms and conditions if i have done any mistake kindly forgive me and unblock me.because of the block iam unable to create articles.kindly unblock me.this is more than fourth time iam requesting you to unblock you. Vandhi04 (talk) 14:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You should review the policy about using multiple accounts, WP:SOCK. You have requested multiple accounts to be unblocked, which indicates that you don't understand the problem. Huon (talk) 16:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
i