Information icon Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. One or more of your recent page creations, such as Draft:Wolfpack Digital, give me the impression that you are receiving payment in return for editing Wikipedia, and/or work for the person or organisation that the page is about. Note that according to the Wikipedia Terms of Use, paid editors must disclose their connections. Before making any more edits, please reply to this message and state whether or not you are being paid, and place the template {{ping|Passengerpigeon}} in your message so that I am alerted. Do not be worried about disclosing your connections; paid editing with disclosure is allowed on Wikipedia as long as you follow all of the relevant policies and guidelines and maintain a neutral point of view. If you have questions, you may contact me on my talk page. Thanks! Passengerpigeon (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Passengerpigeon: Hi! I confirm that I have read the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and wrote the Wolfpack Digital draft considering all the rules of writing unbiased content. I work for Wolfpack Digital, therefore I am getting paid to create a WikiPedia Page for the company.

  • Thank you for your reply. I have posted the paid contributor disclosure message on your userpage. Please note that although the page you have created isn't blatant spam, it still has issues with promotional tone - Wikipedia shouldn't be viewed as a channel for business promotion, even in a subtle manner, and articles need to be written in an entirely neutral encyclopedic tone, including coverage of negative information such as corporate controversies (if any exist), to be accepted. Also, please note that links to external websites don't belong in the body of the article. Look at one of our many pages on software companies to get an idea of what encyclopedic writing looks like. Thank you, Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfpack Digital (June 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 18:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Valentina Biciuc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 18:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Wolfpack Digital

edit
 

Hello, Valentina Biciuc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wolfpack Digital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply