User talk:Vítor/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Vtrnascimento, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Link removals

Why are you removing all those backlinks just based on a proposed deletion? If the prod is removed, then the article is orphaned and someone will have undo all that work for no reason. It's different if it was actually deleted but you're being ridiculously overly aggressive here. You removed all back links to List of supercentenarians who died in the 1980s based on a prod which was denied and it's largely orphaned there with nothing to gain. Now that I've listed it for AFD, you removed it again and if it is kept, it will again be orphaned and more work is created for someone else. I'm going to ask that you immediately stop using Twinkle this way and consider reverting all your removals. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Actually, I'm bringing this at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Vtrnascimento about whether these edits should be reversed in bulk or not. Either way, it's pre-emptive and not a proper use of Twinkle to me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing that. Technically the admin who closes the AFD or deletes the prod is responsible for that since they know exactly when it's been deleted but there's so much to do and so few of us so any help is always appreciated. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey

Hello thanks very much 😊👍

Jason MacGabhann (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Only warnings

I tend only to use them if the edit with which I am dealing is obviously vandalism - like on the American Revolutionary War article, the editor I ended up blocking was adding an X-rated link to the page and nothing else. If it's something about which there could be any doubt I would tend not to use it. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

One more coffee! :) Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

Hey Vítor, was wondering why you removed my edits on the How Big How Blue How beautiful tour, I put a lot of time into that and it was all factual and true, added in to enhance and grow the page. Defintely wasnt happy to see you just delete all of that. Shad754 (talk) 07:04, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Dark Star

Talking about that particular version... Actually, there are no particular sources that say mention clearly that fact, not even deadlists.com. This source: http://www.glidemagazine.com/82760/grateful-dead-europe-72-40-years-later-a-tale-of-two-cities-part-ii-the-paris-dark-star-may-1972/ says that the second verse was performed first time on this tour, and the comments in the "Dark Star 1971" article on deadessays.blogspot.com say that in 1972 the second Dark Star verse was sung only March 23, May 24, and July 26. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.73.98.91 (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@93.73.98.91: Hi IP, so... From what I know of Wikipedia sourcing rules, comments are not recommended to be cited as sources (see WP:NEWSBLOG). And... I actually can't even help you much on this subject, because I'm not versed on Rock and such.. U can seek some help with the creator of that article (User talk:Mudwater)... he seems to know something about it. Vítor (talk) 19:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Cat-a-lot

Not sure that they've been codified for Wikipedia; they're pretty much the same as those for Commons.

This page has a bit more info on how to get the script. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

This is the only page I know of. Not sure if there's anything else. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry vitor

Yes vitor I am ok with you tagging my page for deletion, it was my first try at an entry so i hope you can forgive me I didn't mean to create internet clutter. Thank you for understanding.

Forestbailey11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forestbailey11 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

@Forestbailey11: Okay, I forgive you. Don't worry about it, you can use your sandbox to make your pages (if you aren't sure that the content is relevant enough to be an actual article on Wikipedia). Vítor (talk) 01:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lola Yoʻldosheva, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages In and Style. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of S.C. Alba

This club is clearly notable having competed in the Portuguese national cup on numerous occasions:

Taça de Portugal

Ano Liga Fase J V E D G
2010/2011 Taça de Portugal 1ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 0-2
1993/1994 Taça de Portugal 1ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 0-1
1992/1993 Taça de Portugal 1ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 0-1
1991/1992 Taça de Portugal 1ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 1-4
1990/1991 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 0-1
1989/1990 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 2 1 0 1 2-2
1988/1989 Taça de Portugal 4ª Eliminatória 4 3 0 1 10-4
1987/1988 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 2 1 0 1 3-2
1985/1986 Taça de Portugal 3ª Eliminatória 3 2 0 1 4-10
1984/1985 Taça de Portugal 1ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 0-1
1981/1982 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 2 1 0 1 4-3
1980/1981 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 2 0 0 2 0-4
1979/1980 Taça de Portugal 4ª Eliminatória 3 2 0 1 6-3
1978/1979 Taça de Portugal 3ª Eliminatória 2 1 0 1 4-1
1977/1978 Taça de Portugal 3ª Eliminatória 3 1 0 2 4-3
1976/1977 Taça de Portugal 5ª Eliminatória 4 2 1 1 9-9
1975/1976 Taça de Portugal 4ª Eliminatória 4 2 1 1 3-2
1974/1975 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 0-1
1973/1974 Taça de Portugal 1ª Eliminatória 1 0 0 1 0-1
1972/1973 Taça de Portugal 4ª Eliminatória 3 2 0 1 4-2
1971/1972 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 2 1 0 1 1-1
1970/1971 Taça de Portugal 2ª Eliminatória 2 1 0 1 2-2
1969/1970 Taça de Portugal 4ª Eliminatória 6 3 2 1 10-6

Source: http://www.foradejogo.net/team.php?team=353

League Octopus 10:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

@League Octopus: K. Thanks for the info. And you didn't even need to send the message because the PROD had already been removed. Vítor (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for welcoming me Vitor.Jonytano20 (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2 october 2016

Rollback

Hi Vítor. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

@Widr: Thank you very much. Vítor (talk) 20:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Edit to Thomas Connolly (gymnast)

Dear, good morning.
I find this source "Tom Connolly"., also looking for the general article about gymnast at LA Olympic Games in my native language there was the same information as Thomas Francis Connolly Jr.. I don't fill in the note, sorry. Now I'm not usual with english wiki convenction so if think that the source is right, can you want to add again the edit instead of me, please? Will be up to you. Have a nice day --Petit Pinko (talk) 08:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

@Petit Pinko: Hi. This source (Sports Reference), I guess, is widely used in this Wikipedia and in other big ones. This source is all right. I'll add it for you, to solve it faster. Vítor (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Vítor, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Vandalism

Please review this edit of yours, and look at Assyrian Siege of Jerusalem. After that, are you sure the edit was incorrect? And calling it "vandalism" definitely seems unjustified IMHO. Debresser (talk) 09:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

@Debresser: What would u want me to do when there was a "citation needed" tag near the text? Couldn't interpretate the edit in other manner but vandalism/test, in the sense that he just put the information that came to his head in the text for "the lulz" (I actually should have good-faith reverted him and sent a notification of unsourced changes). Vítor (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Yep. :) Debresser (talk) 18:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

@Debresser: What the... what did you mean by this? Can you answer it in a proper manner, please? Vítor (talk) 20:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

I agree with you that you "actually should have good-faith reverted him and sent a notification of unsourced changes" Debresser (talk) 21:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

@Debresser: Oh, got it. I asked you this because I'm not a native English speaker, and a person saying this in my language would be seen as being ironic. Vítor (talk) 22:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Neither am I. A native English speaker. I was trying to be laconic about it. What is your native language? Debresser (talk) 07:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

@Debresser: Portuguese. Vítor (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I love languages, but never got to Portuguese. Fine, wish you nice continued editing on Wikipedia. Debresser (talk) 17:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey

Maybe don't delete edits if they're clearly not vandalism? It's a little hostile. Bots are bots for a reason, they require human input. I realise there was no source, but seeing as we're talking about translating a language, it could've easily been looked up to complete the edit, instead of reverting it entirely. Basically, I know what I'm about son. But cheers for the welcome and the links. Davedudie (talk) 00:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Chagrin Falls Rival

Hi I found sources that show Kenston is the rival of Chagrin Falls High School in everything. They don't play each other in football and basketball anymore but they are still rivals. The only problem is I can't cite them. Can you please do it? http://www.news-herald.com/article/HR/20161002/SPORTS/161009930 and http://kenstonlocal.org/khs/2016/09/29/kenston-vs-chagrin-rivalry-continues/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob.smith.69 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Ilya Ehrenburg

My source is being a native speaker of Russian and knowing the IFA. The other pronunciation doesn't have any source.--77.66.234.102 (talk) 09:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@77.66.234.102: Please read WP:RS, WP:V, WP:CS. Vítor (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vítor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vítor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vítor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 09:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)