User talk:Undead warrior/Archive 3

Goldeneye (estate)

Hi Undead warrior, I was wondering if you could comment on this edit? To clarify the reasoning, could you leave a comment on the talk page? - Tbsdy lives (talk) 09:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Black Metal and Satan

I'm a pleb where music's concerned, a lover of Shakira. I was just wondering, is Black Metal the type of metal, out of all the types of metal music, whose lyrics etc. are the most concerned with Satan? I ask out of curiosity and also out of wondering if my AfD notification was given to the right metal wikiproject. I know most metallers aren't satanists really, but thought as the phrase Hail Satan is sometimes used by bands and fans, a wikiproject might have an opinion on it.Sticky Parkin 04:25, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, just to say I've removed the section including my request at the metal project, because the nominator accused me of "canvassing" although IMHO my request was neutral, hope you don't mind. I just don't need the hellish torment of the AfD being started all over again. But thank you for your comments. Sticky Parkin 22:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Award

		Sanguis Bibimus, Corpus Edimus
		For standing up for what you considered to be right, which happened to support The Side that Will Always Win(I'm just joking) in an AfD. Rock on! Or whatever you metalheads say lol, H.S. :)Sticky Parkin 21:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching

I hear you are looking for a coach. Anyone with a flaming hellpot award meets my criteria. Jehochman ^Talk 03:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Accessibility

You may want to consider switching your signature to match your username. Also make sure your email is enabled. Being easily accessible is a good thing. Jehochman ^Talk 03:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

The Mandrake (band)

People tend to look down on Myspace as a ref or link :( Sticky Parkin 23:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Spiders in the Night

This song did chart, at #20 on the UK Singles Chart. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

left a note on your review page

User:Undead_warrior/Review#WP:RS I wasn't sure about doing this, so hope it's ok. :) Sticky Parkin 01:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Ephebic Oath

Hi Undead warrior. I noticed that you removed the stub tag from Ephebic Oath. How is that article not a stub? Thanks, -- Avocado (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, I hope you don't mind if I put it back on, then. -- Avocado (talk) 22:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Checking in

Hi, how are you doing? Jehochman ^Talk 02:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Martin John Callanan

If you think that Martin John Callanan should be speedied, please explain why in the AfD on it that was going on when you attached the speedy deletion request (which I have removed), and which is still going on now. Thank you (and no reply needed, though a response at the AfD would be welcome). -- Hoary (talk) 03:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Here is your edit: see how you slapped the speedy-delete request above an AfD notice. If you think that the AfD is unnecessary and that the article should instead be speedied, feel free to say so at the AfD. -- Hoary (talk) 05:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

San Jose Golddiggers

Hi Undead warrior, In regards to the placing of the San Jose Golddiggers article for deletion, I have some information I'd like to pass on to you in an effort to stop the deletion of this article.

Google isn't the only legitimate reference source for info on the internet. Yahoo was several listings other than Wikipedia to use as references. The list includes:

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5] (this one gets the team name wrong, but that is the only mistake)

The league was televised by ESPN and I have VHS tapes of games somewhere in my storage locker, literally a couple of hundred game action photographs, MLV volleyballs, programs, media guides, a pennant, etc. from the Golddiggers. I even have the advertising tape for DHL Courier Service that was on the net for the final match in Major League Volleyball history, the 1989 MLV All Star Game.

This isn't a hoax, the Golddiggers really existed from 1987-1989. I hope this info helps clesr up the misunderstanding.

Thank you for your time, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bill swanson (talk • contribs) 06:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

re: Golddiggers

My sources are not reliable ?

Are you seriously trying to tell me that Texas A&M 's bio for their volleyball coach is not reliable?? What do you think? We aren't inventing this information. Do you think we are all hallucinating??

Why do you want to kill the article? Do you have a problem with the Golddiggers having existed? Why would we perpetuate a myth on Wikipedia? I was a season-ticket holder for the Golddiggers and one of my best friends at the time was one of their team photographers. ESPN televised the league, were they imagining it too?

Google is NOT a reliable judge of whether anything existed prior to Google's existence. The net doesn't care if anyone remembers the team. We that cared for Major League Volleyball and the San Jose Golddiggers are the ones who want to remember. You dispute the info without reason. I can't recall asking Texas A&M to fake their coaches bio. Come on, be real here. I'm not the only person who gave you a website to check.

Please don't wreck it for those who care about the Golddiggers being remembered.--Bill swanson (talk) 22:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

re: re: Golddiggers

Undead warrior - I did not post this article, I only added to it. I wasn't trying to be rude, I was responding to you saying my sources weren't reliable, which is questioning my integrity and also my intellect.

Minor fringe sports, as some like to call them, are, by nature not well covered by the media, including the internet. Saying the team was a hoax is ludicrous. What do I need to do, send you a copy of a videotape of a match on ESPN? Would that be deemed reliable? Photos?

Why is this a difficult thing to accept for you. I have given you several sites, whether Geocities or not, I didn't create ANY of them, don't know the people who did. Another poster offered you another one. Just because a stupid search engine doesn't find much on the team doesn't mean it didn't exist.

What can I do to get this deletion stopped? I guess very few people remember that the web was virtually non-existent when the league played from 1987-1989, so posting articles and pictures from the team and the league hasn't been done as well as it should've been. Not, in my humble opinion, a reason to go on a vendetta to get the article deleted. I'm only trying to stop the deletion of the article from wikipedia. Not cause you a problem. Thank you for your time.--Bill swanson (talk) 16:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

In addition: here are some more links to help verify the Golddiggers.

[6]

[7]

[8]

I hope these help clarify the situation. Also, the Golddiggers played before capacity crowds, including standing room, at San Jose Civic Auditorium (capacity 2,200) for virtually every match in team history. The team could've drawn more, but the arena was too small. MLV awarded the Golddiggers as host city for the 1987 finals and the 1989 All Star Match as a reward for their attendance numbers. I understand that 2,200 isn't a huge crowd, but if attendance figures were a criteria for relevance, most minor league baseball and hockey teams would not be deemed as relevant.

Volleyball Monthly magazine covered the league extensively, ESPN televised the MLV match of the week, All Star Matches and the MLV finals, both of which were, unfortunately lost by the Golddiggers.

I am researching more info from the San Jose Mercury-News newspaper, the city of San Jose and the San Jose Chamber of Commerce as well as ESPN and Fox Sports Bay Area (formerly known as SportsChannel Bay Area). When I have more to give you I will add it here on your talk page. Thanks,--Bill swanson (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

re: Golddiggers, again

Undead warrior - Now who is coming across as rude? You were the person who insisted on reliable sources, so I sent them to you first. I was trying to see if you would accept these sources as reliable. You seem to be the only person who is asking for confirmation, so it seemed logical to send you the links. Civility is a two-way street. I will put them on the article, but wanted you to see them first. --Bill swanson (talk) 00:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

MedRevise.co.uk

Hey, I thought you might be interested in this, since you are medically active here on wikipedia. With a colleague I have set up a Medical Revision website, called MedRevise.co.uk. It is not trying to compete with Wikipedia, but trying to be something else useful, different and fun. If you are interested, please read our philosophy and just have a little look at our site. I would appreciate your feedback, and some contributions if you have the time. Thanks a lot! MedRevise (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Thescore.jpg

With due respect, what are you talking about? It is an album cover and the image page has both a fair use tag and a fair use rationale. Furthermore, it states that Thescore.jpg "is a cover of the album The Score - An Epica Journey by Epica." There was no point in the template. —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 16:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

As I said, there is a source written down. The quote I pasted in my previous comment on your talkpage ("is a cover of the album The Score - An Epica Journey by Epica.") is there for a reason. That is your source. Simple as that. From what URL the image was uploaded is irrelevant. As the fair use rationale on Image:Slipknot - Vol. 3- (The Subliminal Verses).jpg says: "[The] creator of this digital version is irrelevant as the copyright in all equivalent images is still held by the same party. Copyright held by the record company or the artist." To prove that URLs are really not needed, look at the album cover pages of most featured articles. Image:The JAMS- 1987 (What The Fuck Is Going On?).jpg, Image:SmashingPumpkins-Adore.jpg, Image:Silverchair - Diorama.jpg or Image:PavementSlayTracks.jpg. And there's more. —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 11:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

A small note

Hi Undead warrior! Just a small word of concern - you came across as slightly bitey during this AfD. Please keep in mind that our new and occasional users could use a word of encouragement for their efforts, even if they haven't gotten quite the hang of all the finer points of Wikipedia etiquette yet. Cheers, henrik•talk 19:41, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Gimje Airport

Yes I understand. The airport constuction project was cancelled few months ago. The airticle has no meaning. It is ok to delete it. Bye ^.Cjwon 348 (talk) 10:07 (UTC)

Re: Aria C Jalali!

The band used to be called Aria C Jalali! after the singer, but is now Railcars. I'm thinking the Aria C Jalali! page should be deleted, with the information and sources from that page transferred to the Railcars page. Thoughts? Stan weller (talk) 18:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Plan on responding anytime soon? Stan weller (talk) 19:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Venom picture

I noticed that you used one of my photos for the Venom article. Cool but it seems that wikipedia has a problem with the cc license used for this picture, I really don't know why !! Hervegirod (talk) 09:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Airport Notablity

With your recent activites with privatly owned Oregon Airports I highly recomend you participating in the Airport Notability project going on. We'd greatly appreciate your input. Thanks, --Trashbag (talk) 22:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: User:Undead warrior/non: "I just started in oregon. Have fun." You might disagree with the notability of the Oregon airport articles (and note that I think merging is a good idea in many cases and am unlikely to !vote "keep" on many of these), but the only reason you have so many to pick on is that Trashbag worked very hard to complete the Oregon airport lists, which has happened with very few states. Though effort is not a rationale for "Keep" at Afd, I think it would be nice if you could acknowledge the good faith efforts of Trashbag and maybe try to tone down the commentary that implies that it will be fun to go after his articles. See you around. Katr67 (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

My Image

The album cover you wrote about in the message you sent me is all done by me. I already wrote a description as to how I went about creating it. Isn't that enough? TheSickBehemoth (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)TheSickBehemoth

Luiza Lago Martins

Like yourself, I nominated Luiza Lago Martins for speedy deletion. As it was declined, I hope you will support the AfD for this article.--otherlleft (talk) 11:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

In praise of a job well done

Hey there. While we may disagree on the merits of the article on the St. Elizabeth Hospital Heliport, and while you expressed exasperation about my input to that and other AfD discussions, I have to say that I am highly impressed with your contributions to the project. Please accept this as a token of my appreciation to your fine work here:

		The Editor's Barnstar
		In praise of your intelligent contributions to improving the depth and scope of Wikipedia's content and character. Job well done! Ecoleetage (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, a job well done deserves praise! Ecoleetage (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

CSD:G3

I've removed the CSD:G3 from Steven Disraeli. G3 is for pure vandalism including blatant hoaxes, not for something that we suspect is a hoax. The Prod and AfD process is designed to give people time to demonstrate that the article is not a hoax, and benefit of the doubt should be afforded to the article's editors. If the Disraeli "hoax" is blatant to you then I must humbly disagree. —  X  S  G  17:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kosherat.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kosherat.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Adminship

Undead warrior, I guess you may be interested in adminship. Looking through your contributions, I see a lot of good activity. Ask Henrik notes above, make sure that editors less experienced than you are not put off by valid criticism. I recommend waiting a couple weeks, and then I'd be willing to nominate you, if you agree. Jehochman ^Talk 15:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Your talk page might get busy. I recommend using an archivebot. You can copy code from my page if you like the idea. Jehochman ^Talk 15:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

the AfD

Thank you for your concerns. You will please note that sometime prior to your message on my talk page, I had struck the word "bad faith" from my comment at the AfD. But as the very brief pattern of editing is not representative of that of a newcomer, I will keep my suspicians. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 15:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Emalina Afd

I was out by the time this closed, but I just wanted to respond to some of your last comments. First, "her one event is not a notable one anymore. It was notable for a small while, but not anymore. And, if the result is delete, you can always redirect the page ti the list of youtube celebrities" [9]. You cannot have an event that reduces in notability, anything that is determined notable at a point in time remains notable for ever more on wikipedia, this is a basic concept, and has nothing to do with fame or public perception. And you cannot redirect a deleted article, that is the whole point of deletion, its gone. To create a redirect, which I thought I had explained to death in the debate, the correct outcome needs to be merge. In light of this I'm genuinely concerned at you being considered for adminship above. These are basic issues that too many normal editors get wrong, but admins should get right. It's also quite shocking that MBisanz gave no closing explanation at all given the amount of basically wrong comments in that Afd.

Secondly, "What he's saying is that if anyone does one event and it gets a decent amount of attention, then they would get an article by your rationale. If someone does one thing that is notable, and only one thing, that is not worthy of a page on an encyclopedia. It might be worth mentioning in a large article that encompasses many one hit wonder you tubers, but, it does not deserve it's own article" [10]. Again, I thought I had explained to death the difference between warranting a bio and warranting mention in an appropriate topic (with a more appropriate and encyclopoedic title than "one hit wonder you tubers"). You described exactly what I was supporting, not the retention of an article but mention of the event elsewhere, which is exaclty what WP:BLP1E ratifies. I am just bemused as to how a high school science competition winner would get coverage in national newspapers, if that is what he truly meant. MickMacNee (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Please contact the closing admins if you'd like clarifications from them. As far as I know, delete and merge are essentially the same result. You are right that notability is permanent. Perhaps the comment had incorrect word choice. The subject may have been very visible for a brief time, but they are not notable, could be a better way to phrase it. Jehochman ^Talk 00:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Band COI

Could you check this report: WP:COIN#Paid editing. Could you look at the two articles and see if they need cleaning up or deleting and maybe tag them? Thanks. Jehochman ^Talk 04:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Go Fuck Your Jewish "God"

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Go Fuck Your Jewish "God", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 13:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Puzzlez Ov Flesh

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Puzzlez Ov Flesh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 13:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Heads up: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Go_Fuck_Your_Jewish_"God" Ecoleetage (talk) 19:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fuck your jewish god.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fuck your jewish god.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Dimmu Borgir & Daray

I can't find any mention of Daray in Dimmu Borgir's official myspace (http://www.myspace.com/dimmuborgir). Unless this isn't their official myspace...

And I am not edit warring, but only reverting unsourced changes (and Daray being new Dimmu Borgir memeber might be true, but it is still unsouced). Please provide sources.

Semi-offtopic: And what about Hellhammer? --193.198.17.211 (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I've found it after all, however it was in an old blog entry, so it wasn't so obvious to find (initially I tried to find it by searching for "Daray" and "Dariusz" on the page and found nothing), you coud have been more specific.

Cheers. --193.198.17.211 (talk) 16:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sunny Day Real Estate - The Rising Tide.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunny Day Real Estate - The Rising Tide.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I've fixed it.--Michig (talk) 07:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Do not argue about the fear factory picture if you have no idea what you are talking about. Its very clear you still are not sure about the picture and when Dino left. Im always correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.183.20.215 (talk) 01:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Live with full force - sfu.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Live with full force - sfu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

why would you delete a page of band that you know nothing of? even if you have no interest or knowledge of a genre of music which has a global following, it doesn't give you the right to delete the bands page. just because you may know nothing about something, it doesn't give you the right to delete the information pertaining to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grilledvegetables (talk • contribs) 10:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)