Speedy deletion nomination of Attique Raza

edit

Hello Umarhammad472,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Attique Raza for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. The Colour in Anything (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. The Colour in Anything (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dima Bashar. Jim1138 (talk) 05:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hammad 05:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC) sorry i'm just trying to add links.

License tagging for File:Dima Bashar (ديمة بشار).jpeg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Dima Bashar (ديمة بشار).jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dima Bashar (ديمة بشار).jpeg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Dima Bashar (ديمة بشار).jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safiel (talk) 04:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 08:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Umar Hammad, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 08:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply