January 2019

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joseph Keble has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Joseph Keble was changed by Tyrtrfd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950077 on 2019-01-31T19:53:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Tyrtrfd, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Tyrtrfd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tennessee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 19:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennessee natural resources (February 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your revision to Benjamin Banneker

edit

I have reverted your revision to Benjamin Banneker. Your revision is not supported by a reliable source (WP:RS).

Your revision repeats a myth (that Banneker constructed the first clock ) that reliable sources have disproved (see Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Banneker's clock). Please note that Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations directs readers to Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker, which reports a number of myths about Banneker's accomplishments that lack support by reliable sources and/or that reliable sources have disproved. Corker1 (talk) 05:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply