Trjumpet

Welcome!

File:Sephiroth.gif Hello, Trjumpet, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my talk page.

---

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
• If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
• Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
• You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
• You might want to add yourself to the New User Log.
• If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language.

Happy editing!

‡ Jarlaxle 23:46, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

Garbled Names

Thanks for your sharp eye for names that are misspelled on the LoPbN tree. You might like to see what i did to consolidate the info after you did the more intellectually demanding work of identifying the problems; if so, look in this list] for the pages that we both worked on in the same day, and view the Page-histories to see both the subtlety about the alpha order that you missed, and the way i set up what might be called "duplicate entries for the misinformed". (I'm going to look for more like them, outside the parts of LoPbN that i track most intensively, since i think you've done something valuable and i'd hardly be so ingrateful as to expect you to go back and do it over my way.)
Thanks again,
--Jerzy·t 07:13, 2005 July 22 (UTC)

Ludwig I, Grand Duke of Baden

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- Francs2000 | Talk 23:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Saint Alexander Briant, or Bryant

Hello Trjumpet, Thank you for your article on Saint Alexander Briant. Like you I am trying to do some work on Saints. I am particularly working through the 'reds' on the Forty Martyrs of England and Wales. The spelling of the Saint's surname is different, Bryant, not Briant, so I had done some work before discovering your original article.

I have just 'redirected' the Bryant spelling, which is how it appears on the Forty Martyrs page, to your article.

I find it a very humbling experience to read about their heroic lives. It has a particular resonance here, I am English. So, thank you for your good work. - Pat McDonald 17:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Naming conventions for Saints

Hi, I've noticed that you have created a few articles from a list of Saints. When you create the articles please make sure to follow the Wikipedia naming conventions when creating the articles. Most of the red links on the page link to an older incorrect naming style. Since you are interested in the saints lives you may want to check out Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia topics. Thanks! --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 22:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm glad to see that you are still contributing to wikipedia and are still working on the Catholic Encyclopedia. Thanks and keep up the good work! --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 15:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 0% for major edits and 37% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 83 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 16:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Carafa or Caraffa?

Hi. I reverted your edit of Carafa-Caraffa, and created the redirect from Carafa. In all history books I have (I'm Italian), I've never read the "Caraffa" spelling. I think it's one of the typical deformation or out-of-date version of Italian names that I find in English books. Therefore I can think that the "Carafa" diciture must be preferred. Ciao! User:Attilios

Hermann II, Margrave of Baden

Tried my best in translating it. I´m working on Württemberg`s rulers. Maybe we meet again.--Tresckow 07:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Find-a-grave

Please do not add links to Find A Grave to the References or Sources section if that content was not in fact used as a reference. It can be added as an external link, but in general, the content at find a grave is not very reliable as a source. older ≠ wiser 16:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Also, you have added Find-a-grave links to a large number articles which looks like link spamming to me. -- Barrylb 09:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Ezequiel Cabeza De Baca

Hello Trjumpet. Thank you for your contributions to the biography of Ezequiel Cabeza De Baca. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Trjumpet! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be. Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany | finger on pulse Wikipedia:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board | finger on pulse

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 23:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: 1952-53 FA Cup

No problem on adding the links. I'm pretty sure got them all right. I'm interested in football history, but unfortunately (other than online) it's difficult to get that much info where I am, on the other side of the planet from the UK. Grutness...wha? 10:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Non-league clubs who have resigned during season

Please do not keep removing clubs who have resigned during the current season. The convention to use Strike text suffices. - fchd (talk) 19:08, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

No worries. Excellent work updating the membership lists, by the way. - fchd (talk) 20:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Trjumpet! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Adam Drummond, 17th Baron Strange - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Proposed deletion of Adam Drummond, 17th Baron Strange

The article Adam Drummond, 17th Baron Strange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to establish Wikipedia:Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mais oui! (talk) 08:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I have a family member who was told 70 years ago that she is descended from the royal family in Baden beginning about 1860. She has documented proof that she believes backs up the story. Can we communicate with you for advice or assistance? Thank you Leonholder (talk) 05:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Some simple help maybe needed - the new papabili list

If you have the time and the possibility the new List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave WP article could need some help. You could start by taking a look at the talk page. Thanks Pgarret (talk) 09:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC))

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Trjumpet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Trjumpet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trjumpet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)