also: picture is 'fair use,' and everything is in order. thank you. Trappedin3dimensions (talk) 05:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fair use.

Trappedin3dimensions, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Trappedin3dimensions! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Dom&roland1.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Dom&roland1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Please do not use piped links to add commentary on articles, as per WP:POINT. a13ean (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Liberty Fund

edit

If you think these piped links are appropriate, please discuss them on the talk page (ditto the see also link). I see them as a violation of NPOV. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Motion Picture Association of America, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply