Welcome edit

Hello Topsikrets, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Topsikrets, good luck, and have fun.Aboutmovies (talk) 06:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dean Biddulph edit

 

The article Dean Biddulph has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dean Biddulph for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dean Biddulph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Biddulph until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Daron mann edit

Hello Topsikrets,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daron mann for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Daron Mann.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


TheFamousPeople.com as a source edit

Hi Topsikrets. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in List of people from Port Elizabeth. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Transfermarkt edit

Since much of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with List of people from Port Elizabeth. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daron Mann edit

 

The article Daron Mann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not have evidence of meeting the notability standard

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:39, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Charlton Tobias edit

 

The article Charlton Tobias has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the GNG. My WP:BEFORE search did not identify any significant coverage of Tobias in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:11, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply