March 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

TopSnekWiki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi TopSnekWiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Natasha Crown

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Natasha Crown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kirbanzo (talk - contribs) 21:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Natasha Crown

edit

  Hello, TopSnekWiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natasha Crown, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Natasha Crown

edit
 

Hello, TopSnekWiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Natasha Crown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023

edit

  Hi TopSnekWiki! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

Make sure to use reliable sources WP:RS for your edits. --David Tornheim (talk) 11:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply