Tognopop

WikiProject France

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 16:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ferrari GT California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ferrari GT California was changed by Tognopop (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-06-01T12:13:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Bernard Roy

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bernard Roy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bernard Roy seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bernard Roy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Lucy Gordon (actress)

A tag has been placed on Lucy Gordon (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 13:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Lucy Gordon (actress)

A tag has been placed on Lucy Gordon (actress), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 13:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Lucy Gordon

You obiously don't want the article deleted. I advice you really get more thorough with the article and explain why you don't think it should be deleted on its talk page. If you have any more questions, just ask me on my talk page. Thank You. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 13:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mozinor

A tag has been placed on Mozinor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ninety:one 22:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

This was a trap, and you go into it quickly ! ;) I will prove you that this article can be on Wikipedia. Tognopop (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mozinor

A tag has been placed on Mozinor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

WP:POINT. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. Thank you. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

You should understand that I do wish to make a point and you should see that this article exist on the french Wikipedia since a long time. Tognopop (talk) 02:35, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michel Maure

A tag has been placed on Michel Maure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Like all others on this page, this article will be kept... You should think before delete ! Tognopop (talk) 14:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mozinor

The article Mozinor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. There's one reference which might indicate notability but that's all, and not a lot of relevant stuff on the web either. This article has twice been speedied for notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 14:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

You may look at this before delete this article. Tognopop (talk) 15:09, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

• No, you can fix the article! andy (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I know, you can do it too, french not so complex ;) Tognopop (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michel Maure

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 16:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

You should look at the french article on him and think before delete, like all people on this page. Tognopop (talk) 16:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

In re Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff

I see you undid my redirect on this page. The reason for my redirect is our policy on people notable for only one event. It is sort of complex, but essentially it states that that if a person is known (notable as shown by reliable sources) only for one event, it is best to have the biographical information at the event page and redirect the persons to the event for navigational purposes. At the moment there is not enough biographical information to warrant a split. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Like others people on this page, you should think before writing your answer.... Tognopop (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm really not sure what you mean by this... I typed this message myself (It is not a WP:Template), and supported my response with well established policy. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Did you see that before writing your answer ? Tognopop (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not really sure what the French Wikipedia's polices are on subjects that are only notable for one subject. But the page is redundant to the main page. If the biography needs to be expanded, then that page is the best place to do that. Please note that I am not saying they are not notable, merely that they are not independantly notable of the Bogdanov Affair. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

This is your point of view but not mine. Like all others articles of this page, it will finally be created. This is just a question of time. Tognopop (talk) 17:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

It has been created in 2015 as I said. Tognopop (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tognopop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Vector WX-8 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vector WX-8 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vector WX-8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tognopop. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)