Welcome! I encourage discussion between persons, especially when it concerns Articles and discussion due to collaboration or disagreement. While I accept constructive, I do not accept disrespect. Also, if it concerns an Article, please ensure to note the Article being referenced. Finally, I ask that everyone remember to sign with their username including the date and time stamp. Thank you. -Raleigh, the Honourable, Th.D, OSF Thetruchairman (talk) 02:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please Enter Text for Discussion Directly Below This Line







Help Links There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Secret society edit

Hello :)

I removed your additions to the article because they were not supported by citations from reliable sources - if you are unfamiliar with the Wikipedia guidelines and policies on reliable sources and citing, please see WP:RS and WP:CITE for more details. I find it to be a good practice to add citations as I go along, as opposed to adding them later. Your additions is not 'gone' from Wikipedia but still available in the articles history, and rolling back is easy.

It is also a good idea - although sadly not in common use - to mark an aricle you're working on and havn't finished with the template {{in use}} or {{under construction}}.

No hard feelings I hope. Yours, WegianWarrior (talk) 20:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Thetruchairman, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Thetruchairman/sandbox edit

 

Hello, Thetruchairman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 21:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Canadian Armed Forces, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JACKINTHEBOXTALK 10:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply