January 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Qzd. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Noura Erakat seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 21:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are absolutely incorrect. My corrections were unbiased and neutral and more accurate than AIPAC's (pro-Israel lobby) recommended euphemism "Israel/Palestinian Conflict" - to hide the FACT (from the American public) that Palestinians have been living under Israel's illegal occupation since 1967 (after Israel took land by force in 1948, forcing the removal of Palestinians who were living on that land at the time). Most Wikipedia pages related to Palestine misinform US readers by ignoring factual history to represent the State of Israel in the best light.
Most Wikipedia biographies list professional titles and experience first. For Noura Erakat, you diminish her professional credentials by listing "activist" first, as if that is what Wikipedia wants readers to remember most about this person.
I've tried to correct other Wikipedia pages when I come across similar misrepresentations of historical fact and biography. The last time, I was accused of "vandalism" by one of you "contributors?" "editors" - you who obviously decide which facts you want to present, which facts you want to ignore and which facts you want to misrepresent with obfuscating language. Before that experience, I naively trusted that Wikipedia was correct because corrections were universally allowed. Now I know that isn't true.
So....you people who actively hide the facts about the origins of the State of Israel, the illegal occupation and the horrifying situation of the Palestinian population - you are complicit in the genocide taking place at this moment. Lie to yourself and readers. But decades from now, when all Palestinians have been killed or forced off the land that the State of Israel has claimed since 1948 (all of it), your children will wonder why you allowed that genocide - why you helped to hide the truth from American readers. Hurrah for you. Theoryisn'tfactuntilproven (talk) 22:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Cullen328 (talk) 22:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please be careful to avoid editing anything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict until you have made 500 edits. Cullen328 (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
"Arab-Israeli conflict" should not be the term used in this article!!! That term is biased - it is NOT a neutral term - because it ignores THE FACT that Israel illegally occupies Palestinian land. It uses "Arab" to ignore the reality that the Palestinians are living under Israel's illegal occupation. Wikipedia decides "Arab-Israeli conflict" is neutral because the term doesn't offend Israeli's?!!! It's a huge offense to Palestinians - but obviously, Wikipedia editors don't care about them. Only Israel matters. Theoryisn'tfactuntilproven (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your response is a violation of the editing restriction described above. That restriction applies equally to pro-Israel editors and pro-Palestinian editors, and is enforced without bias or favoritism. You must comply just like everyone else on all sides of this conflict, or you will be blocked like countless others who refused to follow the policies that have made Wikipedia a top ten website worldwide for many years. Cullen328 (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Hello Theoryisn'tfactuntilproven and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Newslinger talk 07:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 08:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please note that the pages you have edited on Wikipedia so far are also covered under the following contentious topics:
Two of the above contentious topics (Arab-Israeli conflict, Syrian Civil War & ISIL) are covered under additional restrictions, also detailed above. — Newslinger talk 08:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello Theoryisn'tfactuntilproven! Your additions to Talk:The Grayzone have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 08:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply