Welcome

edit
Hello, Thenewswriter! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! South Bay (talk) 00:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

June 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Main Osama, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Main Osama was changed by Thenewswriter (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-06-23T22:15:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Kavita Radheshyam 1.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Kavita Radheshyam 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 20:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kavita Radheshyam 2.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Kavita Radheshyam 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 22:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Image File:Kavita Radheshyam Shoot 1.jpg I have now uploaded my own work which i have the rights for. I am a Professional PR (Publicist) and Photographer for this Actress and this creation that i have uploaded is my own work, I have also distributed some more pictures in other various media. Thenewswriter (talk)

Stop

edit

Please do not upload any more images until you have read and understood our licensing requirements. Particularly images belong to someone else. If you persist we will have to act. Spartaz Humbug! 22:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

New File

edit

File:Kavita Radheshyam Shoot 1.jpg

I have now uploaded my own work which i have the rights for. I am a Professional PR (Publicist) and Photographer for this Actress and this creation that i have uploaded is my own work, I have also distributed some more pictures in other various media. Thenewswriter (talk)

Why then is the new file exactly the same that you uploaded earlier as somebody else's work, and just cut away the copyright mark? Fut.Perf. 06:24, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
That is beacuse as i mentioned in my earlier message, I have also distributed Pictures to various other media on the internet. If there's a Problem, I will upload other Picture. Thenewswriter (talk)

Another Image

edit

File:Kavita Radheshyam Shoot 2.jpg

I have now uploaded my own work which i have the rights for. I am a Professional PR (Publicist) and Photographer for this Actress and this creation that i have uploaded is my own work, I have also distributed some more pictures in other various media. I hope no rules are violated this time. Thank you. Thenewswriter (talk)

I don't believe a word of what you're saying. I have blocked you indefinitely. Fut.Perf. 15:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just because i am new here, You don't belive a word that i am saying? So this is what you all call a Wiki Support. Instead of helping a person, You block him. Well thank you. You will not see any more uploads by me. Thenewswriter (talk)