Wikipedia:WikiProject Bad Religion

edit

Hello. Would you be interested in being part of the Bad Religion WikiProject? If yes, click here. I'm also looking for other Wikipedians who are Bad Religion fans (or fans of punk rock) who could join as well. Alex 21:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

I'm brazilian, and i want to know a thing. Do you know the track listing for this songs: "Gotta Get Away", "Kick Him When He's Down", "Smash It Up", "Spare Me the Details", "Can't Repeat" and "Next to You"? Thanks, feel free to reply back on my talk page. 201.11.226.3 (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks The Skeleton. 201.11.226.3 (talk) 05:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC). talk page.Reply

Hi

edit

Hi Skeleton, I created this = They Were Born to Kill, but I'm brazilian and I don't know if I do correct, can you see if I make correct?

And can you put a image for the article?

Thanks. OffsBlink (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:They Were Born To Kill.jpg

edit

This image is just too big- you have said that it is low resolution in the fair use rationale, but album covers rarely need to be bigger than 300x300 pixels. J Milburn (talk) 10:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks; much better. J Milburn (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

They Were Born to Kill

edit

Thanks a lot The Skeleton, I do some changes in the article on pt.wiki = pt:They Were Born to Kill, based in your changes. I always created this article = pt:The Offspring Collection, based in yours wiki, and many others articles, always based in en.wiki.

Unhappily in pt.wiki there are not the fair-use, and we can't use the images on singles and albums, but I always create articles based in yours wiki, bacause en.wiki is the best, there are more than 2.000.000 articles.

Thanks for all Skeleton, big hug my friend!

OffsBlink (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Theoffspringmeaningoflifecover.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Theoffspringmeaningoflifecover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BlackballWaiting The Offspring.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:BlackballWaiting The Offspring.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

Hi

edit

Hi The Skeleton, how are you?

See this = They Were Born to Kill, the user:Holland25 change dates and created this = Tehran demo tape, is he correct?

OffsBlink (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

OffsBlink (talk) 01:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks for the invitation on WP:WikiProject The Offspring, I already made some adjustments on the Offspring chronology and in The Offspring discography. I alrady made the article Tehran on pt.wiki.

Thanks. OffsBlink (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Hi The Skeleton, Totalimmortal and Next to you are offspring's singles?

See here

If are singles

Do you know the format?

When those singles was releaseds?

Thanks. OffsBlink (talk) 22:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bad Habit

edit

"Bad Habit" is a single, released in CD, in 1994???, see here the CD single. Is an extensive single, how "Anthem Part Two" for example, and it is a live single, how "Dumpweed", you can see the track listing here, I retrieved the track listing for this site.

What do you think??

Is a single??

OffsBlink (talk) 04:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Hi The Skeleton, I created the article "Bad Habit", can you put this image in the Bad Habit article? Thanks. OffsBlink (talk) 20:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bad Habit bootleg.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Bad Habit bootleg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bad Habit (song)

edit

Sorry, the article was not "fallaciously deleted". First of all, it's not deleted. Secondly, the consensus was clearly for a redirect. I'm sorry you disagree; feel free to take it up at WP:DRV. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 04:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

edit

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:16, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit

Thank you very much for that. Much appreciated. Yeah, I've been helping out as there are hardly any people who update the darts articles. I'll try and help out on most articles, and maybe some user should request for a Darts Wikiproject or taskforce or something along those lines. Cs-wolves (talk) 18:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Darts player form New Infobox plus help required...

edit

Hi, I've just created a template called template: Darts player form which allows you to input the players results for the past 4 years. I've only added it to Phil Taylor's article for now. Take a look and see what you think. I won't really have time to edit all the top players and source the info, but I've posted this message on many users pages so it may be used.

In addition, I've not really had the time to update 2008 in darts which has been bereft of updates since around September. The Pro Tour results are also lacking updates. It may not be a page that continues with 2009 in darts if its not significant enough. Again, if you or any other user wants to take control of adding results then I'd really appreciate it. Seedybob (talk) 11:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

2009 in darts

edit

Hi, I noticed that you are a big contributer to dart-related articles and thought I'd let you know that I have just created a 2009 in darts article. Please feel free to improve the article, as I don't keep up-to-date with darts. Pyrrhus16 (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:OriginalPranksterVideo.jpg

edit

Thank you for uploading File:OriginalPranksterVideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Want You Bad.jpg

edit

Thank you for uploading File:Want You Bad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposal of WikiProject:Darts

edit

I have proposed a new WikiProject, named WikiProject:Darts. If you think the idea was good, you can support this proposal there. Armbrust (talk) 01:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Peacocks & weasels

edit

Wikipedia cannot, even with sources, state that any article subject is "the greatest" at anything, as this is a violation of WP:NPOV. About the best we can get away with it a more neutral statement such as the most successful whatever, if that is supported by sources, and then if someone really notable in his/her own right, in a relevant context can be reliably sourced as stating that the subject is "the greatest" we can quote that luminary saying so, by name, later in the article. If this doesn't make sense to you, try inverting the situation: If we find some reliably published articles claiming that George W. Bush is an "idiot", we cannot call him an idiot in the lead, or even say that he's "widely considered" an idiot. We can note that his competency has been challenged by various parties, and after the lead, like in a criticism section if someone particularly notable for political commentary like Larry King can be reliably quoted as referring to Bush as "an idiot" we can quote that. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 04:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Darts invite

edit
  You have been invited to join WikiProject Darts. We are dedicated to improving and expanding darts-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in darts and/or your edits to Darts-related articles. If you would like to join, please click here, and add your name to the bottom of the list of project members.

~~~~

 


Mr.Kennedy1 talk 10:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unfinished discussion at WikiProject Darts

edit

Hi, I invite you to finish the dispute for the importance ratings on darts articles.

Click here to see discussion.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Darts at 16:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC).Reply

Feedback requested for article on Daily Mail: Quotation from Lord Rothermere's "Youth Triumphant"

edit

Hi The Skeleton,

I would like to discuss the reason for excluding the quotation from Lord Rothermere's Youth Triumphant editorial and have outlined my justification here. I'd appreciate your thoughts on the matter.

Thanks,

— Posted by Luke Goodsell, 08:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gervinho because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 00:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Part, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Part, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Theoffspringprettyflycover2.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Theoffspringprettyflycover2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Theoffspringoriginalprankstercover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Theoffspringoriginalprankstercover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Prettyflycover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Prettyflycover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, The Skeleton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:They Were Born To Kill (The Offspring album - cover art).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:They Were Born To Kill (The Offspring album - cover art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply