User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2019/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding the appropriate scope of our timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — JFG talk 21:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Tulsi Gabbard
When you said "someone whose opinions you have absolutely no interest in",[1] were you referring to me personally having no interest in their opinions? If so, please do not make assumptions about what I think. I am asking you a second time,[2] please stop explaining basic policies to me of which I am well aware. We are alternately talking about the opinion expressed in the NBC piece and the coverage of the NBC piece itself, but it is confusing because you keep bringing up the content of the stories when I am not talking about that. Kolya Butternut (talk) 22:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have not seen you adding opinions by Rachel Marsden or anyone like her to articles. Based on your comments on Talk:Candace Owens, I imagine you would not be a big fan, but if I am wrong, I apologize.
- Content must be based on policy and therefore it is necessary to refer to policy. You claimed that weight only concerns opinions, so I think it is relevant to show that it includes factual content as well. Anyway, there is a long time between now and when Biden loses the election, so we there is no rush to update articles for every piece of breaking news.
- TFD (talk) 23:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- No I did not claim that weight only concerns opinions. Kolya Butternut (talk) 23:14, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- You wrote, "We're not discussing establishing the weight of an opinion, we're discussing whether to include the coverage of the NBC article." (20:42, 31 May 2019} I am sorry if I have misread your comments, and would be appreciative if you could explain what their relevance was. TFD (talk) 23:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- I feel like I already did that. Kolya Butternut (talk) 23:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- You wrote, "We're not discussing establishing the weight of an opinion, we're discussing whether to include the coverage of the NBC article." (20:42, 31 May 2019} I am sorry if I have misread your comments, and would be appreciative if you could explain what their relevance was. TFD (talk) 23:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- No I did not claim that weight only concerns opinions. Kolya Butternut (talk) 23:14, 31 May 2019 (UTC)