TheGreenJohn
This is the talk page!
TheGreenJohn, you are invited to the Teahouse
edit
|
Hi TheGreenJohn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
ZipcodeZoo
editHello TheGreenJohn. First of all: thanks for helping out with moth and butterfly articles. Could I ask you a favour though? Please do not use ZipcodeZoo and EOL as sources for species lists. These websites are full of errors (they list all synonyms and subspecies as valid species)... If you want to make a list of species for a genus page, I suggest you use LepIndex, taxapad, funet and/or wikispecies (best is to use a combination of these). Please note: LepIndex is great, but somewhat outdated. Taxapad is great for some families, but was hacked recently, so dont use it for now. If it's back up, it's a great source for taxonomy. Funet is good for butterflies and some moth families, but very incomplete. Same for wikispecies. Furthermore, I am wondering if it is such a good idea to add an explanation about the Noctuidae vs. Erebidae on every genus page, I think it would be better to just discuss it on the family pages and wait for the dust to settle so it is clear what the new taxonomic tree for the superfamily will look like. Cheers and happy editing! Ruigeroeland (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Grammodes geometrica
editHi, TheGreenJohn: I have seen that you are one editor of the link Grammodes geometrica. I have seen that the pic in the lower of the article is wrong. Doesn't belongs to G. geometrica but Trigonodes hyppasia. The other with the taxon is correct. I don't know how to edit that, so I hope you can do it.
Thanks and sorry if is this not the right way to ask for that fix.
Happy editting!
--Macrodomo (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Reply Posted on Macrodomo's Talk page:
Hi Macrodomo, I saw your post about the image on G. geometrica and would love to fix it. Can you give me the source of your information that the lower image is, in fact Trigonodes hyppasia? With a source I can go ahead and change the title for that image as well as remove it from the page. Thanks for the help
--TGJ (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, TheGreenJohn. Thanks for your advices, sometimes I'm very inocent in this things.
In the wikipedia you can find the pic of trigonodes hyppasia, this is the correct pic in the correct website.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonodes_hyppasia
G. geometrica has the lines absolutely parallel: the lines in Tigonodes hyppasia starts in a common point, making three angles, that is the means of "trigonodes"; "tre" (from τρία)=three, "gonodes" (from γωνία)=angles.
Other link:
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/ophiusini/ophiusini_13_1.php
Or just take a look in google searching images with trigonodes hyppasia. there you can find the wrong pic and see that the author of the pic has correctly clasificated the moth: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trigonodes_hyppasia.jpg
I hope it has been helpful for you.
Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macrodomo (talk • contribs) 04:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)