Telescoperasp
December 2023
edit
Hello, I'm Tropicalkitty. An edit that you recently made to Golden Cap seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tropicalkitty (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Brian Garrow. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. I'm not seeing the point behind many of your edits, and your edit summaries don't exactly explain what your actually doing. Onorem (talk) 22:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- What mostly do you really mean by ''no point" to my edits, which really is fairly significant. It said to essentially expand the text and basically fix the grammar issues.
- Being an administrator of Wikipedia, it seems like it's important to be aware of this Telescoperasp (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SpencerT•C 22:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)- @Spencer you could have just warned me but damn Telescoperasp (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Spencer like if you really hate me why dont u delete my account like I want that Telescoperasp (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Telescoperasp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not guilty and my actions were not malicious. You may have been mistaken. As a student, I have always used Wikipedia as a reliable source for information. However, recently, I found myself in a situation where my account was suspended due to suspicion of malicious attempt to vandalism. This came as a shock to me as I have always been careful and responsible in my use of the platform.
I want to clarify that I did not, in any way, use Wikipedia for malicious intent. In fact, I have always been a contributor to the platform, constantly editing and updating articles with accurate and credible information. I have never edited or posted anything with the intention of causing harm or spreading false information.
I believe that my account was suspended due to a misunderstanding. Perhaps, my editing history may have been misinterpreted as malicious activity. I want to assure the Wikipedia community that this was not the case. I take pride in my contributions to the platform and have always been respectful of its guidelines and policies.
I am deeply saddened by the suspension of my account and I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or concern it may have caused. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and credibility of Wikipedia and I would never want to jeopardize that in any way.
I also want to clarify that I did not create my account with the intention of causing trouble. I simply created it because I wanted to be a part of the Wikipedia community and contribute to its vast collection of knowledge. I was excited to share my knowledge and expertise with others and learn from others as well.
I hope that the Wikipedia community can understand my situation and give me a chance to continue contributing to this amazing platform. I am willing to cooperate and provide any necessary information to prove my innocence and regain access to my account. I am passionate about sharing knowledge and I believe that my contributions can add value to Wikipedia.
In conclusion, I want to reiterate that I did not use Wikipedia for malicious attempts to vandalism. I am a responsible and dedicated contributor who deeply respects the platform and its community. I sincerely apologize for any misunderstandings and I hope to have my account reinstated so that I can continue to be a part of this wonderful community.
Telescoperasp (talk) 03:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Chatbot-generated unblock requests are not considered. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 06:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Telescoperasp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not guilty and my actions were not malicious. You may have been mistaken. This is not a chatgpt written response I also put a genuine reason on the appeal websiteTelescoperasp (talk) 11:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Obvious vandalism is obvious. Yamla (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Telescoperasp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Bro, why are all the admins against me? Are you blind? I am not committing vandalism. I simply corrected the grammar in texts and lengthened them. Why don't admins simply go and look like themselves?Telescoperasp (talk)
Decline reason:
I've looked through all of your edits (which you can view for yourself at Special:Contributions/Telescoperasp), and I can't find a single one that improves Wikipedia. They are all obvious vandalism. – bradv 17:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Telescoperasp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The first sentences of vandalism on wiki are "On Wikipedia, vandalism is editing the project in an intentionally disruptive or malicious manner. Vandalism includes any addition, removal, or modification that is intentionally humorous, nonsensical, a hoax, offensive, libelous or degrading in any way."
By this terminology and proof, it means that if you have checked, I have not done any of these things. Also, to ensure that I am using the unblock request correctly. If you had examined the changes, you would have realized that I do not have any malicious behavior or changes. Your time is greatly appreciated. Best of luck
Decline reason:
I too examined your edits, and even putting them in the most positive light, they did not improve the encyclopedia. I would tend to agree that they were vandalism- but even if they aren't, they were disruptive. Since you think you have done nothing wrong at all, there are no grounds to remove the block. It is also clear to me that these requests are unproductive so I have decided to remove talk page access. You can make further appeals via WP:UTRS once you decide to own your inappropriate actions and tell us what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.