Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepsi AM (May 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Waqar💬 17:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tatsnorad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waqar💬 17:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepsi AM has been accepted

edit
 
Pepsi AM, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grabup (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Femtanyl (May 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Tatsnorad, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Charles G Reemelin to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 01:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles G Reemelin (August 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Kvng (talk) 22:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vernonaspis moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Vernonaspis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Azarctic (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Otto Marmet

edit

Thank you for creating Otto Marmet. Significant parts of the article remain unsourced. Do you plan to source these sections? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

yes Tatsnorad (talk) 18:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edwin Marmet moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Edwin Marmet. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Edwin Marmet, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Edwin Marmet. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Tatsnorad: Just submit the article for AfC Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Edwin Marmet

edit
 

The article Edwin Marmet has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Arijit Kisku (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Brodek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SDP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of William Marmet

edit

Hello Tatsnorad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged William Marmet for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wolverine XI (talk to me) 10:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Otto Marmet

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Otto Marmet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Edwin Marmet

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edwin Marmet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Copying text

edit

It is rarely acceptable to copy any significant amount of text from other places to Wikipedia, for several reasons, including the fact that doing so often infringes copyright, and the fact that most often such text is not written in a suitable tone and style for a Wikipedia article. However, if on any occasion you judge that posting copied text is suitable, you must state where you copied it from; if you fail to do so then you are committing plagiarism. JBW (talk) 14:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply