Synorem

Questions & concerns

Notice: December 2023 Revert Hi Synoreum, Some of my edits to the Rhinovirus article were recently reverted and tagged as vandalism by your account through Ultraviolet. While these were major changes to an article, they were made in good faith to correct for major redundancy, lack of summaries, and out of date information. Can you review these changes? If necessary, please provide constructive feedback on whether this otherwise violates editing policies. @WalkEFelix WalkEFelix (talk) 07:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Y A mistake was made. I apologize, it seems like I had made a mistake and as such I have restored your edits. Your warnings have also been removed. Synorem (talk) 07:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Notice: Changes to Thanos The way that it is now, all of the alternate universe things are grouped together aside from the bit about the Ravagers. On pages for a number of other Marvel characters, their alternate universe versions have been organized into a list like that. Examples include Gamora, Steve Rogers and Peggy Carter. I was just changing the format to match what was done to other pages which looks a lot better. It's really clunky and too clustered together like this and it looks better organized as a list like that. Thanos just has too many alternate selves for it to work as a single paragraph group. 32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Your edit was factually incorrect. You stated Thanos had been "defeated by the illuminati" instead of by Supreme Strange. Sources, specifically a quote from Professor X state otherwise. Oh!!! You reverted the whole thing, just change the title of the section instead. I thought that writing Supreme Strange as the title for a section about Thanos didn't make much sense. My mistake.--32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) PS: the text in that section was what was already there in the Other Versions section that I reorganized, I didn't write that, I just moved it. In case you were talking about the text instead of the title itself.--32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Notice: Changes to Saim Ayub page Hello synorem,I just noticed you reverted my category add that i did on Saim Ayub’s page of Test crickrter but if you actually look at his biography he was once selected for a test series against Australia so that technically makes him a test cricketer. Wikicontributerr (talk) 06:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Y A mistake was made. I apologize, it seems like I had made a mistake and as such I have restored your edits. Your warnings have also been removed. Synorem (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Notice: Articles needing cleanup: Domnall Ua Lochlainn Hello. You've reverted a cleanup I made on the above page, in effect creating a nonsense statement. Please desist. Hibarnacle (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Your edit contained the phrase "the the first king to construct something" which amounted to unconstructive editing. My revert was for the sake of accuracy. If you believe a page is 'in serious need of cleanup' please use the correct tags as seen here. Synorem (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: USVI 2024 GOP caucus Hello, I removed some candidates from the list of candidates who have since withdrawn. I have noticed other editors have done the same action on author primary/caucus articles, as those candidates (Christie, Burgum, etc.) are no longer declaring candidacy. Thank you Colin.1678 (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC) If possible, when removing large portions of texts adding an edit summary helps recent change patrollers like myself understand why you had removed the text you had. If possible, including a source that shows the candidates have withdrawn always helps too. Thank you :) Synorem (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC) Notice: Dakota kai Please stop removing my #KingKotaMovement #WeWantDakota #VegaKingdom #WeWantZelina Zelina and Dakota know about it, that's why I'm adding it 2603:7080:EEF0:60B0:4D7C:CEF7:A9B1:B94C (talk) 13:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC) Simply adding the hashtags to their page is not constructive. Please see WP:NOT. Synorem (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: Your revert at Coquettes Hi there, Regarding your reverts/edits to Coquettes, what's going on there? 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC) @Filmssssssssssss Not sure what the deal is with the foreign article, however my revert relates to the vandalism/un-constructive edit that served as a climate-activism warning. I've fixed up the language now, removing the vandalism Synorem (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC) Thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: LDS Church I am attempting to edit errors, and remove unsupported and unnecessary statements on this page? Are you a member of the LDS Church? WarBishop (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Hello there. I do not know what the LDS Church is, nor am I a member of it. I am, however, a member of Wikipedia - and your edit went against Wikipedia's rule on unsourced content. If you going to amend information, please cite your sources to ensure verifiability of your information. Synorem (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC) How do I cite the fact that an unsupported opinion statement was removed? I’m am senior clergy of this Church WarBishop (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC) You changed the word "alleged" to "confirmed". Could you include who or what confirmed this? How did you know this were confirmed? Synorem (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Got it, Yes, their are statements from his wife and the postal record. I will find them. WarBishop (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Awesome, thanks in advance! Just redo your edit and cite these records and your changes should be all good :) Synorem (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: Zombie Land Saga not including any elements from Zombieland movies I'm curious, why didn't Zombie Land Saga include the rules from Zombieland movies such as Cardio, double tap, etc.? 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Having not watched any of these movies, I'm going to assume you're here because of your reverted edits to Zombie Land Saga. The section you began with "WARNING" did not provide constructive material relating to the production of the movie. Could you fill me in as to what the sentence "Approximately 10 years will be required before we can safely confirm their Swiss army knife. Unfortunately, we will either beware of bathrooms, or do we have anyone to carry on my Bowling ball." meant for the production of the movie? Synorem (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Actually, I was talking about the production of Zombie Land Saga. 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Could you fill me in as to what the sentence "Approximately 10 years will be required before we can safely confirm their Swiss army knife. Unfortunately, we will either beware of bathrooms, or do we have anyone to carry on my Bowling ball." meant for the production of the movie? I can't say I see how this relates to the production. Synorem (talk) 10:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC) That's just the parody of the intro of the first Mega Man X game! 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) And this related to the production of a movie how? I hope you can appreciate why your edit was undone. Synorem (talk) 10:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Because I thought that Zombie Land Saga was based on Zombieland movies due to its title alone 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC) I mean, they want to include the rules from Zombieland movies such as Beware the bathrooms, bowling ball, Swiss army knife, etc. And Zombie Land Saga was released almost 10 years after the first Zombieland movie! 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Synorem, this IP is an WP:LTA. I've blocked (again). -- ferret (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Ah, makes sense. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: Page on Kim Tok Hun Hi, just to let you know, you tried to undo one of my changes because I took down some images, however these images were clearly AI generated. Please allow them to be removed. Kind regards. 185.160.113.242 (talk) 14:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Hi there - AI generated images are allowed as it is considered public domain. The edit of yours I reverted did not remove anything, but you had merely added "THIS PICTURE IS CLEARLY AI GENERATED!" onto an image label, which does not help in a constructive manor. I have taken the liberty of updating the copyrights of the image and updating the page. Synorem (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: samael aun weor my intention is not to vandalism but to make it visually apparent upon first reading that the aforementioned person is distinguished as he truly is which is a cult leader. my intention is to help others avoid this cult. as a quick google search would have saved me and many others from years of horrific abuse at the hands of this movement. Surface surfer (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC) @Surface surfer the word 'cult' is a contentious label, and is listed as a generally disapproved word as in our Manual of Style's words to watch. I understand you have good intentions by warning others, but Wikipedia serves to inform - not warn, our users. Synorem (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC) I believe that is informative to describe him as such. Jim Jones has cult leader in the info section of his bio. What justifies that? Perhaps the fact that he used his beliefs to commit mass murder, which literally fits the definition of a cult. Synorem (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) What kind of sources do I need to legitimize the statements about him being a cult leader? Surface surfer (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC) First it must fit the definition, then to avoid NPOV & MoS issues, most likely a third-party source such as a news article. Synorem (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) he also is listed amongst the list of cult leaders on wikipedia does not justify the title? Surface surfer (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC) That is because YOU made the edit that he was a cult leader, @Surface surfer. Synorem (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: Stonehenge of the Netherlands Hello, it is possible to reach my site through other pages now. I removed the orphan tag, i hope that's ok. DutchPatriot (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Yep, looks better now @DutchPatriot Synorem (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Great! Wish you a good day DutchPatriot (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: Mistake Hi there! I completely understand your emphasis on Wikipedia having a neutral point of view; I completely agree too, and keeping a neutral point of view is a high priority in my edits. I appreciate you putting in the effort to prevent people from injecting their own opinions into articles. With all due respect, I do think your reverting of my edits was mistaken. It seemed automated, so I don't blame you, but all I did was echo some of the information already stated later in the article. I also didn't think the article's introduction did enough to illustrate how influential the film was (one publication even called it the "beginning of a renaissance"; this is, again, later in the article. Why should it not be at least hinted at in the introduction?), or the status it holds among modern critics and publications (especially in contrast to its contemporaneous reception). Alas, the articles for other similarly influential and revered films use the exact same language which I added to the article. My main goal was/is to encourage more consistency between all articles on Wikipedia. The article for Seven seemed to deviate from the norm a little bit, and did not do enough to illustrate how it is regarded by critics today, or how influential it was (from an objective point of view, like every other film article does). I'll reinstate my edits but use more neutral language. Thank you! RMLF (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC) Hi there @RMLF, thanks for getting in touch. Unfortunately I stand by my point of your edits being biased. Your statement was "Seven is generally regarded as one of the best and most influential thriller films ever made". Without any sources, this sounds to me like a opinion - especially as you did not cite this publication you mention. The words 'best' is even listed as a word of puffery that may introduce bias on the Wikipedia's MoS Words to watch list. Having looked at your newer edit, however, I think we can come to a conclusion that it is a lot better in terms of neutrality than your former edit, and I am happy for your new edit to stay, as it definitely seems like you've taken aboard my point. Thanks again for asking, and thank you for helping make Wikipedia a better place :) Synorem (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: Vandalism You reverted an edit by 219.74.120.63 to the Jürgen article. The vandal has now repeated his vandalism, which I've reverted. This is just to alert you to the renewed problem. 24.189.193.10 (talk) 20:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC) No problem - thank you for your help! :) Synorem (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: The upcoming Zombie Land Saga anime movie will bring back the staff members of the Jesse Eisenberg movie titled Zombieland Hello, I'm here because of 182.3.42.96's edits of MAPPA regarding Zombie Land Saga the Movie. But will Ruben Fleischer direct Zombie Land Saga anime film like himself did to the live action Zombieland movies? 2404:C0:5C20:0:0:0:7F9:D392 (talk) 06:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC) @Ferret LTA most likely. Synorem (talk) 01:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Yep. Blocked. -- ferret (talk) 01:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Notice: Please add back my changes >:( LilacBliss (talk) 22:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC) "(and better ads)" is not constructive, nor was it sourced or explained what you meant by 'better'. Synorem (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC) (Personal attack removed) 100.2.103.83 (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: Hi Synorem! I hope you're having a good day. Can you share with me which hyperlinks you deleted and why? I'd be happy to do more research in order to find the correct ones if these were inappropriate. Thanks! Danah El Kaouri (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC) Hi there @Danah El Kaouri - The link I deleted was the Paris one, which led to the Google search results for "paris" which of course wasn't really helpful. I see now you've linked it to Paris which is much better :) Synorem (talk) 12:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: 9 March 2024 I'm wrong about something? 109.165.94.181 (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC) Your edits to Roderich Kiesewetter are directed towards him, as well as making unconstructive insults towards him. Wikipedia is not meant for this, and correctly, your edit was reverted as it was unconstructive. Synorem (talk) 13:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: 11 March 2024 buddo i got raped the world must know 203.214.46.130 (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Your local police force must know; not Wikipedia. Please read what was left on your talk page. Synorem (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: re changes on Jonathan Glazer Hi, you have removed my edit stating it to be "not neutral", but you did not delete another person's comment that states that "His acceptance speech at the Oscars will go down as one of the most destructive antisemitic deeds of our time ironic for someone who made a film about the holocaust and the murder of 6 million Jews systematically. This will indeed mark a turning point in progressive thinking as like the snake who ate its own tail Glazer seems to be self sabotaging his own legacy with self inflicted cheap soundbites." Is this neutral to you? 46.34.193.134 (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Hi there - Huggle only monitors recent changes. Your edit was listed for review, not theirs, thus why I removed yours and not theirs. You are correct in stating that the other edit is un-neutral, and I see someone else has taken the liberty to remove it from the article. Synorem (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: Megasteel32 Blocked them after their initial tirade continued across multiple archived pages and then turned to yourself. Revoked TPA after they decided to carry on. If/when they come back ping me if they direct any more in your direction. Amortias (T)(C) 20:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Will do, thank you for catching up on that. Synorem (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Y'all really don't know what a personal attack is Megasteel32 (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC) @Megasteel32 Welcome back from your block. "Fuck off" is not an observation, by literal definition. This was already explained on your own talk page. Synorem (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Well it certainly ain't a personal attack. This was also already explained on your own talk page (like blud you pasted the same message twice you're acting like you already addressed this.) Megasteel32 (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC) @Megasteel32 An administrator had already agreed that "fuck off" did, in fact, constitute a personal attack. My source for that is your block. Your message of "fuck off" not being a personal attack was also repeated, I'm not sure what your last point in your statement is meant to be. Synorem (talk) 15:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) I explained why I repeated my statement lmao. And no, they blocked me for my personal attack on the original commenter. In what world is "fuck off" a personal attack? It is a command at best, it makes no commentary on your person. Megasteel32 (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) An abusive command at that - which again, falls under WP:NPA, first section. I am confused between you admitting you personally attacked someone, then on the same page you state that we do not know what a personal attack is. Synorem (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC) If that's what counts as abuse on this site we need to get some skin thickeners. Megasteel32 (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC) While your opinion is accepted and welcomed on Wikipedia, if your edits and comments goes against the editing policy, it is removed - regardless of the density of someone's skin. This is something we expect from all editors. Synorem (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: stop harassing me via my wikipedia page user keeps adding DOB information that is both private and inaccurate to my page as a form of harassment. 66.108.111.65 (talk) 01:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC) @66.108.111.65 Nothing I reverted of yours had to do of anything like that. You made an unconstructive edit of placing a '=' symbol in the word "She". I had left a message to notify you that your edit was reverted and why. I would also like to stress the fact that you do not own Wikipedia pages. Synorem (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: Sorry im sorry, but that Rhain person is ruining some pages by removing info. There were many pages that had enough info to be on their own, but Rhain merged it. Stop him because he's boring. GylonVisagie (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC) If they haven't given a valid reason as to why they're removing information, you can simply revert them and ask them why directly. Insulting them on their talk page doesn't solve anything. Synorem (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: Mel Brooks @ VMI The infobox for Mel Brooks lists his education at VMI. That is improbable, but since I lack an authoritative secondary source for his education, I defer to you. You revert vandalism in that article, and belong to CVU. Thanks, AndersW (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Notice: Can you check my Swedish Semigallian war article I have sources now? Can you check threw my article and check if you could let it threw? Karl Erik Edvin (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC) Notice: Apologies I deeply apologize for my mistake as i did not realise it at the time only after your message on the 29th of march i realized about i deeply regret and i hope for forgiveness. I swear on my name it won't happen again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingofhellfire (talk • contribs) 18:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC) No worries mate :) Synorem (talk) 00:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC) Notice: Powar The content you restored on Powar page should not be on Wikipedia as it can hurt the sentiments of that particular community and may create disputes in society. It may create a cold war in society for writting such things on Wikipedia. Alex Cupper (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) Stating that a cold war will start between countries because of an edit on Wikipedia is a bit of a stretch. You may not clear sections of an article just because it may offend someone/a group of people. Synorem (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) Sir it will not start cold war between countries but it will definitely start cold war between communities in india as it is bit of an offensive information regarding the community. Alex Cupper (talk) 01:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) There are a handful of articles that could be deemed offensive or grotesque in nature here on Wikipedia, but again - that is not a reason for it to be removed. Wikipedia is not censored. Synorem (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Notice: Courtesy notice I reverted the edit you accepted on Skopje because the IP editor didn't cite a source for their changes. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) No worries; thanks for the oversight! Synorem (talk) 13:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Notice: Northanger Abbey Removal Hi! I saw your message on my talk page and just wanted to reach out. I did leave a message on the Talk page of Northanger Abbey about my removal of the baseball section, but I forgot to put my reasoning in my edit summary. The baseball section is not relevant to Northanger Abbey and is already on Origins of baseball. Lindy Sachse (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC) @Lindy Sachse Hi there - thanks for letting me know; if it was just a case of a missing edit summery then no worries. Removed the notice on your talk page, you're welcome to redo your edit with the summary included (if you haven't already) Synorem (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Awards & WikiLove templates

Award: Hello fellow traveller! A barnstar for you! The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Hello fellow traveller! You've beaten me to the punch at reverting vandalism 3 times tonight! I encourage you to apply for rollback. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 04:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Award: Star of the Barns The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar For beating me to the punch multiple times tonight on Huggle. Your speed is inspiring my competitive spirit! -REDACTED403 (talk) 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Award: A barnstar for you! The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar Congratulations on ranking among the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Excellent work! – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Other comments and general messages

New message from Zippybonzo  You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Zippybonzo/Training/NPP/Synorem. Just wanted to let you know that I did post something there ;) Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 13:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Yep, I saw, don't worry! Work has been busy, hadn't had too much time to do it - do excuse me. Will get to it now :) Synorem (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

User:2601:249:9280:3820:F822:5605:7F9F:13E9

This user's AIV query was removed without them being blocked. What happened and why did it disappear? Best --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 22:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

It expired. Reports become stale and expire after 8 hours if administrators take no action. See here.

I'd recommend re-reporting them, but they haven't been active since, so it wouldn't be of any use. Synorem (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Lies

You deleted a post in less time than it would have taken to watch the Video mentioned. Are you ideologically driven. Or a bot? 129.222.194.247 (talk) 23:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there - I can confirm I am neither ideologically driven, neither am I a bot. Your edit was reverted because "The following paragraph is a lie" is not constructive in any manor. If you have cited evidence it is false, why would you keep it in the article? Furthermore - you did not cite this 'video' you stated, so I suppose you could say it was also reverted for unsourced content. I recommend you flick through Wikipedia's edit policy whenever you have some time on your hands. Synorem (talk) 23:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)