Disambiguation link notification for March 18 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of terrorist incidents in March 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PFLP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Terrorism in Norway, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Heliotom (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Terrorism in Norway, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Heliotom (talk) 07:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Terrorism in Norway. Heliotom (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in March 2018. Yet more unsourced changes. Final warning. Heliotom (talk) 12:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 16:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 26 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of terrorist incidents in June 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Odd Einar Nordheim edit

 

The article Odd Einar Nordheim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Praxidicae (talk) 18:44, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Odd Einar Nordheim edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Odd Einar Nordheim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro (talk) 19:50, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 19 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of terrorist incidents in October 2018, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PFLP and Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in October 2018. Sheldybett (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Sjö (talk) 18:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Sundeepnor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2018 Brussels stabbing attack edit

 

The article 2018 Brussels stabbing attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No lasting notability. WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natureium (talk) 22:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Adding poorly sourced information edit

Hi Sundeepnor. Some of your additions to 2018 Brussels stabbing attack have been removed because they were not directly supported by the source you cited, such as the claim that "It is being investigated if the perpetrator had ties to ISIS". Please make sure that all of your additions are coming from the sources that you cite. Failure to do so is a violation of our verifiability policy and can and will lead to a block from editing, I'm afraid.

Furthermore, be wary of using tabloid journalism like the Daily Express to source content on Wikipedia, particularly where it relates to living persons. Poorly sourced content about living or recently deceased persons may be removed immediately without discussion, in accordance with our biographies of living persons policy. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 01:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Again, you added unsourced and poorly sourced information at 2018 Brussels stabbing attack. Stop making things up and learn how to source stuff properly. You will be blocked, again, if you continue like this. Sjö (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in November 2018. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 09:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ringsted terror plot for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ringsted terror plot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ringsted terror plot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 03:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2018 Brussels stabbing attack for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Brussels stabbing attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Brussels stabbing attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 22:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 27 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of terrorist incidents in November 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ELN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Sjö (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martinvito, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sjö (talk) 18:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply