Welcome

edit

Hello, StephanieLynne, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcia Douglas (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, StephanieLynne! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcia Douglas (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Espresso Addict was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Espresso Addict (talk) 23:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to Binghamton University appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 21:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your new account User:Stephanielynnec

edit

Please note that per WP:SOCK#NOTIFY you should state on your user page that you have a new/alternative account, even if you don't plan on using this account anymore. Please also read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry carefully. Misuse of multiple accounts can result in a ban. Bennv3771 (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Marvellous Equations of the Dread

edit

I reviewed your article The Marvellous Equations of the Dread. There are several issues that you should really address before creating more articles:

  • WP:COI: If you have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article, please disclose it and submit your article creations through the AfC process instead of creating them directly.
  • WP:Notability: Please ensure that the subject of the article meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, the most basic of which requires multiple independent reliable sources to cover the subject in-depth. To make it easier for reviewers and yourself (as it reduces the chances of your article being rejected or nominated for deletion), please try and cite these secondary reliable sources in your article, instead of relying on WP:Primary sources (including interviews of the author).
  • WP:Original research and WP:SYNTH: Please do not make original conclusions that are not explicitly supported in the sources you cite.
  • WP:NPOV: Please use neutral language and avoid WP:PEACOCK
  • Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout, and don't forget to include a "Reference" section, including the Template:Reflist.

Bennv3771 (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Marcia Douglas

edit
 

Hello, StephanieLynne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcia Douglas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CoolSkittle (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)Reply