Srpalm

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Srpalm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

sethpalmer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

change username to comply with username policy Huckinstitutes (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. PhilKnight (talk) 10:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Here's a few key questions:

• Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
• Do you understand conflict of interest?
• Do you understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a subject that you are trying to create an article about, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to break the 3 important questions above.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

In response to your questions, Anthony:

• Yes, I understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a business directory.

The content of the article I have posted for review is clearly strictly informational, neutral/balanced in tone, and non-promotional in nature.

• Yes, I understand conflict of interest.

The content of the article I have posted is unbiased, clearly cited, and strictly informational (i.e., non-promotional) in nature.

• Yes, I understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable.

When compared to other published Wikipedia articles of similar nature (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Materials_Research, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Materials_and_Processes_Research_Institute, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Minerals_and_Materials_Technology, etc.), I believe this subject can and should be considered equally notable.

I am requesting an unblock in order to change my username to comply with your policy requiring me to represent myself as an individual.

Huckinstitutes (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarkTraceur was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarkTraceur (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Huckinstitutes, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarkTraceur (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Srpalm/Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences

Hello, Srpalm. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)