Squeekur
Talk page
DYK nomination of Trademark Clearinghouse edit
Hello! Your submission of Trademark Clearinghouse at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MASEM (t) 15:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com has been nominated for Did You Know edit
 | Hello, Squeekur. Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated for Did you know consideration to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 05:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC) |
Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com has been nominated for Did You Know edit
| | Hello, Squeekur. Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated for Did you know consideration to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 05:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC) |
DYK for Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com edit
 | On 5 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that an American court case hinges on whether the Communications Decency Act immunizes web-based service providers against civil claims brought by users for harm caused by other users? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc. edit
Hi, Squeekur. I hope you're still around although your course has likely ended.
I just wanted to give you a head-up that the opinion in the case Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., which you created an article on, has been withdrawn by the Ninth Circuit, and will be re-argued in March. You may want to keep an eye on the news and the court and update the article accordingly when the new opinion issues. TJRC (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)