Welcome!

edit

Hello, SpeakTheTruth13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tully Stockton, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! United States Man (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tully Stockton

edit
 

The article Tully Stockton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possibly not notable enough for an article as well as lacking references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. United States Man (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

SpeakTheTruth13, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi SpeakTheTruth13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tully Stockton for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tully Stockton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tully Stockton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gobōnobō + c 04:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

For information on formatting links, may I suggest: wp:links and wp:cite? Putting [6] will not work well. Find the reference which is [6]. It should start with <ref>. Change <ref> to <ref name="Ref6">. (use what ever in place of Ref6). Where you put [6], put <ref name="Ref6"/> See WP:CITEFOOT for "repeated names". Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tully Stockton

edit

I can understand not liking that ugly Article for deletion notice on the top of the page. It needs to stay there, so please don't remove it. OK? Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Sorry just trying to figure this all out. I hope everything looks well now.Reply

Looking good!

edit

Definately looks better then many Wikipedia articles. I hope it passed wp:notability (people)! Best of luck, Jim1138 (talk) 09:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply